Irma Cahyaningtyas
Diponegoro University

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak yang Lahir di Penjara Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Bianca Agnetha; Irma Cahyaningtyas
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v5i2.5723

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the government's efforts in providing legal protection for children born in prison through related laws and regulations and also how legal protection for children born in prison from human rights perceptions. The research method used is normative juridical research. The results showed that in the latest Correctional Law, there are changes and additional provisions regarding children born in prisons. The first provision is that there is a change in the age limit for children to live in prison with their mothers, who used to only reach the age of 2 (two) years to the age of 3 (three) years. Second, the children of female prisoners are placed in a separate room that is kept clean and suitable for the child's growth and development. Third, in the event that the child of a female prisoner is a child with special needs, the child may be placed in a disability services unit.  Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui upaya pemerintah dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi anak yang lahir di penjara melalui peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dan juga bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi anak yang lahir di penjara dari persepktif hak asasi manusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dalam Undang-Undang Pemasyarakatan terbaru, terdapat perubahan maupun ketentuan tambahan mengenai anak yang lahir di penjara. Ketentuan pertama adanya perubahan mengenai batas umur anak dapat tinggal dipenjara dengan ibunya, yang dahulu hanya mencapai usia 2 (dua) tahun menjadi usia 3 (tiga) tahun. Kedua, anak dari narapidana perempuan ditempatkan pada ruangan terpisah yang terjaga kebersihannya dan layak untuk tumbuh kembang anak. Ketiga, dalam hal anak dari narapidana perempuan merupakan anak yang berkebutuhan khusus, anak dapat ditempatkan pada unit layanan disabilitas.          
Obstacles in Proving the Crime of Money Laundering by Law Enforcement in Indonesia Edhei Sulistyo; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Irma Cahyaningtyas
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): FEBRUARY
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v9i1.8025

Abstract

This research aims to determine the obstacles to proving criminal acts of money laundering by law enforcement in Indonesia. The legal view regarding the crime of money laundering in Indonesia is that as long as there is no guilty verdict against the perpetrator of the predicate crime, then anything related to assets cannot be carried out. In practice, law enforcement still uses follow-up measures for money laundering suspects who prioritize punishment over asset recovery. This research focuses on proving the obstacles to the implementation of the Money Laundering Crime Law in the Police, Prosecutor's Office, and Corruption Eradication Commission. The research method in this writing uses doctrinal methods (juridical-normative) and non-doctrinal methods (juridical-empirical or socio-legal). The research results show that there still needs to be more conflict between the interests of law enforcement and the police, especially in terms of proving and recovering state losses. Obstacles to asset recovery that prosecutors can carry out are obstacles for prosecutors who are not given the authority to investigate criminal acts of money laundering that occurred before the 2010 Law on Money Laundering because the old law did not regulate the prosecutors' authority regarding this matter. Affairs. Criminal investigation. Money laundering. Likewise with the Corruption Eradication Commission, regarding the provisions of Article 69 concerning predicate crimes, they do not have to be proven first. Obstacles to Proving the Crime of Money Laundering by Law Enforcement in Indonesia.