Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hurriah: Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan dan Penelitian
Muhammad 'Ariqsyah
Universitas Negeri Padang

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Program Evaluation Models in Technical and Vocational Education and Training: A Systematic Literature Review of Scopus-Indexed Studies (2019–2026) Muhammad 'Ariqsyah; Ambiyar Ambiyar; Fahmi Rizal
JURNAL HURRIAH: Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan dan Penelitian Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Hurriah: Journal of Educational Evaluation and Research (in Progress)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan dan Kemanusiaan Hurriah Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56806/jh.v7i3.456

Abstract

Program evaluation is a strategic instrument for quality assurance, accountability, and continuous improvement in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET). Yet TVET evaluation practices remain fragmented across paradigms, models, indicators, and stakeholder configurations. This systematic literature review synthesizes Scopus-indexed empirical and conceptual studies published from 2019 to 2026 on TVET program evaluation. Following PRISMA 2020, 400 Scopus records retrieved through Publish or Perish were screened; 46 relevant records were identified and 33 core TVET studies were retained for thematic synthesis. Keyword co-occurrence mapping was conducted in VOSviewer at two occurrence thresholds. The findings show that high-visibility TVET literature is dominated by vocational education, systematic reviews, technology-enhanced learning, and employability, while standard program-evaluation models such as CIPP, Kirkpatrick, Stake, and Proves remain under-represented. Most studies emphasize reaction and learning outcomes, whereas behavior-level impact, results-level impact, context evaluation, and utilization of findings remain limited. The review recommends context-sensitive, mixed-method, longitudinal, and stakeholder-inclusive evaluation designs integrated with accreditation and SDG indicators.
Co-Authors Ambiyar, Ambiyar Fahmi Rizal