Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Rurialwan Pawana
Universitas Jember
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Praktik Algorithmic Collusion dalam Penetapan Harga pada Ekonomi Digital Rurialwan Pawana; Sofia Herliana Fatmarani
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 5 (2026): September: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i5.1872

Abstract

The development of the digital economy has encouraged the use of algorithms in price-setting by business actors. This condition has given rise to the phenomenon of algorithmic collusion, in which price coordination may occur through algorithmic systems without direct communication or written agreements between competitors. This phenomenon raises problems in criminal law because the concepts of mens rea and meeting of minds are generally constructed based on direct human conduct and intention. This study aims to analyze the criminal law qualification of algorithmic collusion in price-setting practices and to formulate an ideal model of criminal liability for business actors and/or corporations. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that the use of algorithms does not automatically establish criminal liability, as liability still requires a connection between the conduct, fault, and anticompetitive behavior. Criminal liability should be determined based on the respective roles, knowledge, and involvement of algorithm providers, business users, and programmers. Therefore, normative reconstruction is required through the formulation of a new offense, broader interpretation of existing provisions, or amendments to the applicable legal framework while maintaining the principles of legality and geen straf zonder schuld
Co-Authors Sofia Herliana Fatmarani