Muhamad Fadhila Achbar
Universitas Pamulang

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

STRATEGI BERTEMU STRATEGI: APLIKASI TEORI PERMAINAN DALAM ANALISIS PERSAINGAN BISNIS DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MANAJERIAL Reza Mardiyansyah; Muhamad Fadhila Achbar
Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan [JUMANDIK] Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan
Publisher : LAP4B

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58174/hf22tc92

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of game theory in the context of business competition and managerial decision-making in an increasingly dynamic and competitive economic era. Game theory, first systematically formulated by Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944) and further developed by Nash (1950) through the concept of Nash Equilibrium, has evolved into a highly relevant strategic analysis instrument for modern business management. This study employs a quantitative method with a comparative case study approach involving 85 companies operating in oligopolistic industries in Indonesia. Data were collected through structured surveys and secondary document analysis of annual financial reports for the period 2020-2024. The results indicate that companies adopting game theory frameworks in strategic planning achieve an average profitability 28.4% higher than those that do not (F = 34.217; R² = 0.684; p < 0.05). These findings confirm that a deep understanding of competitor strategies, prediction of competitive responses, and selection of dominant strategies based on Nash Equilibrium are determinant factors in optimal managerial decision-making in business environments characterized by uncertainty and strategic interdependence.
STRATEGI BERTEMU STRATEGI: APLIKASI TEORI PERMAINAN DALAM ANALISIS PERSAINGAN BISNIS DAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MANAJERIAL Reza Mardiyansyah; Muhamad Fadhila Achbar
Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan [JUMANDIK] Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan
Publisher : LAP4B

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58174/hf22tc92

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of game theory in the context of business competition and managerial decision-making in an increasingly dynamic and competitive economic era. Game theory, first systematically formulated by Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944) and further developed by Nash (1950) through the concept of Nash Equilibrium, has evolved into a highly relevant strategic analysis instrument for modern business management. This study employs a quantitative method with a comparative case study approach involving 85 companies operating in oligopolistic industries in Indonesia. Data were collected through structured surveys and secondary document analysis of annual financial reports for the period 2020-2024. The results indicate that companies adopting game theory frameworks in strategic planning achieve an average profitability 28.4% higher than those that do not (F = 34.217; R² = 0.684; p < 0.05). These findings confirm that a deep understanding of competitor strategies, prediction of competitive responses, and selection of dominant strategies based on Nash Equilibrium are determinant factors in optimal managerial decision-making in business environments characterized by uncertainty and strategic interdependence.
Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja, Stres Kerja, dan Konflik Kerja terhadap Turnover Intention pada Perusahaan di Indonesia: Tinjauan Literatur Naratif Muhamad Fadhila Achbar
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Digital Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Purpose: To synthesize Indonesian studies published in 2022–2025 on the effects of job satisfaction, job stress, and work conflict on turnover intention. Method: Narrative literature review of 14 documents (13 unique studies). We extracted data from full texts and synthesized them thematically. Findings: All nine studies testing work conflict, including work-family conflict, report a significant positive effect. Job stress has a significant positive effect in six of nine studies and a non-significant effect in three. Job satisfaction shows the most mixed results: significantly negative in three of six studies, non-significant in two, and significantly positive in one. Neither of the two studies testing satisfaction as a mediator found a mediating effect. Conclusion: Work conflict is the most consistent predictor, while the role of job satisfaction remains inconclusive. Small, single-organization samples and internal inconsistencies in several sources limit generalizability.