Reeny Purnamasari Juhamran
Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Rumah Sakit "IBNU SINA" YW-UMI, Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Acute Appendicitis Ika Ika; Azis Beru Gani; Rezky Pratiwi L. Basri; Reeny Purnamasari Juhamran; Nurfachanti Fattah
Syifa'Medika Vol 17, No 1 (2026): Syifa Medika : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32502/sm.v17i1.10789

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common abdominal surgical emergencies and requires prompt management to prevent complications such as perforation and peritonitis. Patient demographic characteristics and length of hospital stay can provide an overview of the pattern of patients treated at a healthcare facility. However, recent data on the characteristics of patients with acute appendicitis treated at Pelamonia Hospital Makassar remain limited. This study aimed to describe the distribution of age, sex, and length of hospital stay among patients with acute appendicitis at Pelamonia Hospital Makassar in 2024. This was a retrospective descriptive observational study using secondary data obtained from the medical records of patients with acute appendicitis in 2024. A total of 35 medical records that met the study criteria were analyzed descriptively using frequency distributions and percentages. The results showed that patients aged 17–25 years constituted the largest group, with 12 patients (34.3%), followed by those aged 26–35 years with 10 patients (28.6%). There were 18 male patients (51.4%) and 17 female patients (48.6%). The most frequent length of hospital stay was 4 days, reported in 17 patients (48.6%), followed by 5 days in 10 patients (28.6%). Acute appendicitis patients in this study were predominantly aged 17–25 years, with a slightly higher proportion of males than females, and the most frequent length of hospital stay was 4 days.
Comparison Of Postoperative Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index (SII) After Modified Rsdical Mastectomy (MRM) In Breast Cancer Patient Sundergoing Epiduralversus General Anesthesia Dewi Fitri Hastuti; Faisal Sommeng; Darariani Iskandar; Fendy Dwimartyono; Reeny Purnamasari Juhamran
Syifa'Medika Vol 17, No 1 (2026): Syifa Medika : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32502/sm.v17i1.10955

Abstract

Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) may induce a systemic inflammatory response that can affect postoperative recovery in patients with breast cancer. The Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index (SII) is an inflammatory biomarker calculated from platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts. This study aimed to compare postoperative changes in SII among breast cancer patients undergoing MRM who received epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia at Ibnu Sina YW-UMI Hospital. This retrospective analytical observational study used a comparative approach based on medical records of breast cancer patients who underwent MRM between January and December 2024. SII was calculated using the formula (platelet count × neutrophil count)/lymphocyte count, while the change in SII was defined consistently as the postoperative SII minus the preoperative SII (?SII = SII postoperative ? SII preoperative). Statistical analyses included the paired t-test, Wilcoxon test, and Mann–Whitney test according to data distribution. A total of 36 patients were included, comprising 10 patients who received epidural anesthesia and 26 who received general anesthesia. In the epidural group, the mean SII decreased from 839.04 preoperatively to 477.04 postoperatively. In contrast, the mean SII in the general anesthesia group increased from 742.28 to 1,487.24. The comparison of postoperative SII changes between the two anesthesia groups showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). These findings indicate different postoperative SII dynamics following MRM between patients receiving epidural and general anesthesia. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the retrospective design, unequal group sizes, and potential confounding factors that were not fully controlled. Further prospective studies with standardized postoperative blood sampling and adjustment for relevant perioperative confounders are warranted.