Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences
Nurlaily Nurlaily
Universitas Internasional Batam, Batam, Indonesia.
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Dispute Resolution in E-Commerce Through Online Arbitration in Indonesia and India: Adapting EU Regulations Nurlaily Nurlaily; Laely Aribah Istiqomah; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Tantimin Tantimin
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September
Publisher : Greenation Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.926

Abstract

This study explores the regulatory frameworks for online arbitration in resolving E-Commerce disputes in Indonesia and India, drawing comparisons with the European Union’s legal instruments. The rapid growth of E-Commerce in both countries has highlighted the need for effective and efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, especially given the limitations of traditional litigation. The research aims to identify the gaps in Indonesia and India’s legal systems regarding Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) and to evaluate the potential adoption of the EU’s established principles to improve arbitration processes in these countries. The study utilizes a normative legal research methodology, with a focus on legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Findings show that while both Indonesia and India have made strides in addressing E-Commerce disputes, they still face challenges such as the absence of specific ODR regulations, the lack of integrated ODR platforms, and the absence of cross-jurisdictional recognition of arbitration awards. In contrast, the European Union has developed a comprehensive ODR framework, especially through Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 and Directive 2013/11/EU, which provides a valuable model for Indonesia and India. By adopting these principles, both countries can strengthen their legal frameworks and institutional structures, ensuring quicker, cost-effective, and transparent dispute resolution for E-Commerce transactions.
Protecting Muralists Moral Rights in Tourism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam Lu Sudirman; Jocelyn Jocelyn; Hari Sutra Disemadi; Nur Ezan; Nurlaily Nurlaily
Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): (GIJLSS) Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences (September
Publisher : Greenation Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/gijlss.v4i4.1030

Abstract

This study addresses the gap between the legal protection of the intellectual property rights of muralists in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, and the practical protection that arises when murals are used for tourism purposes without permission, attribution, or adherence to occupational safety regulations. This study aims to analyze and compare legal regulations regarding the moral rights of muralists in relation to their use by tourists in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Vietnam, and to formulate future legal protection based on progressive regulations. This study uses normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches, analyzing the relevant primary and secondary legal materials. This study shows that all three countries recognize and protect the ethical rights of muralists, but differ significantly in the scope of rights, enforcement mechanisms, and clarity of laws regarding the use of murals for tourism. Vietnam offers a more robust framework with more enforcement routes, Malaysia provides a clearer formal basis for moral-right enforcement, while Indonesia exhibits significant regulatory gaps regarding tourist exploitation. These findings are important because they provide a comparative basis for re-constructing a more responsive legal framework that ensures recognition, integrity, compensation, participation, and legal certainty regarding the use of murals for tourism.
Co-Authors Hari Sutra Disemadi Jocelyn Jocelyn Laely Aribah Istiqomah Lu Sudirman Nur Ezan Tantimin Tantimin