Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Giza’a Jati Pamoro
Universitas Airlangga
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
From Banking Prudence to Government Procurement: Reconstructing Provider Risk Assessment to Prevent Corruption in Indonesia Andry Lesmana; Muhammad Nafik Hadi Ryandono; Faizal Kurniawan; Giza’a Jati Pamoro
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i2.16335

Abstract

Government procurement remains one of the sectors most exposed to corruption. This article examines a normative gap in Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018, as last amended by Presidential Regulation Number 46 of 2025: its seven procurement principles and ethical rules do not oblige officials to assess the integrity, affiliations, capacity, and performance risk of a provider before a contract is awarded. The study is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches, and it analyses the decisions in the e-KTP and Jambi University medical equipment cases. The findings show that the prudential principle has a legal content distinct from the duty of carefulness, due diligence, and risk management. The 6C, 7P, and 3R frameworks of banking law can be adapted to procurement because both regimes govern entrusted funds and decisions about counterparties under information asymmetry, yielding eight verifiable prudential dimensions linked to each procurement stage. The case analysis indicates that the framework could potentially provide an additional preventive layer where existing controls failed. The article recommends adding prudence to Article 6 and specifying its indicators in an LKPP regulation.
Reconciling Strict Liability and Proportionality in Anti-Doping Law: A Two-Stage Framework for Athlete Protection in Indonesia Muhammad Nabil; Mas Rahmah; M. Nafik Hadi Ryandono; Giza’a Jati Pamoro
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 2 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i2.16423

Abstract

Anti-doping policy aims to protect the integrity of sport, but the strict liability principle under the World Anti-Doping Code may raise concerns about the legal protection of athletes. The research problem lies in the absence of a national framework that clearly distinguishes between establishing an anti-doping rule violation and determining the appropriate sanction, as well as the lack of protective infrastructure that enables Indonesian athletes to access the proportionality mechanisms provided by the Code. The study employs a juridical-empirical (socio-legal) method combining statutory, conceptual, comparative, and empirical approaches, based on interviews with stakeholders and participatory observation. The findings show that Indonesia’s normative framework is largely aligned with the Code. The main challenges lie in implementation, including funding dependence, limited testing capacity, low levels of athlete awareness, inadequate legal assistance, and a mismatch between BPOM product authorization and the Prohibited List. Strict liability remains justified at the stage of establishing a violation, whereas proportionality should operate at the fault-based stage of determining the sanction. The article recommends a two-stage framework for athlete protection, supported by an institutional layer comprising IADO–BPOM coordination, legal assistance, and greater IADO independence.
Co-Authors Andry Lesmana Faizal Kurniawan M. Nafik Hadi Ryandono Mas Rahmah, Mas Muhamad Nafik Hadi Ryandono Muhammad Nabil