Meutiana, Surya
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Problem-Based Chemistry E-Module to Support Phase E Students’ Learning Motivation Meutiana, Surya; Herpratiwi, Herpratiwi; Fitri, Dina Martha
Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah Vol 11 No 3 (2026): Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/tadris.v11i3.30346

Abstract

This study developed and preliminarily evaluated a problem-based learning (PBL)-oriented chemistry e-module on the Law of Conservation of Mass for Phase E students. A modified seven-stage Borg and Gall research-and-development procedure was used, comprising problem analysis, data collection, product design, expert validation, design revision, staged product trials, and final revision. Qualitative evidence was obtained from observations, interviews, needs analysis, and expert comments, while quantitative evidence comprised expert-validation percentages and pretest-posttest learning-motivation questionnaire scores. The e-module was reviewed in two rounds by a chemistry-content expert and an instructional-design/media expert. Its overall mean feasibility scores were 81.43% for content and 91.70% for design and media. Formative trials involved three students in a one-to-one trial and six students in a small-group trial. Mean motivation scores increased from 70.67% to 92.33% (mean normalized gain = 0.72) in the one-to-one trial and from 69.33% to 90.83% (mean normalized gain = 0.7033) in the small-group trial. In the field trial, motivation scores increased from 76.90% to 93.22% in Class X.7 and from 76.03% to 93.60% in Class X.8, with reported mean normalized gains of 0.7070 and 0.7116, respectively. These findings indicate that the e-module was feasible and was associated with substantial within-group improvement in self-reported motivation. Because the field evaluation used no control group or random assignment, the results should be interpreted as preliminary evidence rather than a causal estimate of effectiveness.