Toar Kamang Ronald Palilingan
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sam Ratulangi

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Agama Minoritas di Minahasa Toar Kamang Ronald Palilingan; Stefan Obadja Voges; Natalia Lana Lengkong
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 12 (2026): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i12.4735

Abstract

This article examines the legal recognition and protection of religious minorities in Minahasa through the Jewish community and Lalang Rondor Malesung (LAROMA). Their legal positions are not identical: Judaism falls under general guarantees of religious freedom, while LAROMA is administered within the indigenous-belief framework. Using a socio-legal method, the study combines constitutional and administrative-law analysis with empirical scholarship. The findings show that normative recognition does not always produce equal administrative and social protection. Effective protection requires nondiscriminatory public services, accessible remedies and rights-sensitive local administration.
Temporal Balance Sebagai Model Akuntabilitas Hukum Pers dalam Siklus Pemberitaan Digital: Pengembangan Atas Prinsip Cover Both Sides Stefan Obadja Voges; Lusy Kariana Frililantie Roos Gerungan; Toar Kamang Ronald Palilingan
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 10 (2026): Tema Filsafat, Politik dan Etika Profesi Hukum
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i10.4741

Abstract

Digital news is not fixed after publication; changes, redistribution and postpublication access require balance beyond the cover both sides principle. This article examines press companies' legal responsibility through temporal balance, a legal accountability model whose novelty integrates pre-publication, publication, post-publication and redistribution obligations into one evaluative framework, rather than treating verification, correction and right of reply as separate norms. The research uses doctrinal legal methods with functional comparison across Indonesia, Council of Europe, United Kingdom and South Korea. Findings show the need for continuous accountability distinguishing formal from substantive recovery. This framework positions balance as an obligation that spans the entire lifecycle of a news story, ensuring that legal liability does not cease upon initial publication.