Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesian Journal of Language and Economic Discourse Indonesian Journal of Computational Language Studies Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Legal Discourse Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Educational Studies
Imam Masrur
Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Making inequality speakable: media framing, public emotion, and the language of economic justice in Indonesia Imam Masrur
Indonesian Journal of Language and Economic Discourse Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Debt, inequality, and everyday economic life in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijle.v1i3.1024

Abstract

Background: Economic inequality in Indonesia is increasingly mediated through public language, where statistics, media narratives, and emotional vocabularies determine how injustice becomes socially recognizable. Objective: This study examines how Indonesian media and public-facing discourse frame economic inequality, organize public emotion, and construct economic justice. Method: This study applies qualitative corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis to 36 publicly verifiable media, institutional, civil-society, and scholarly documents, with 16 primary texts coded for framing, affective register, and justice vocabulary. Results: Inequality is most frequently framed through administrative-statistical narrowing, which makes distributional imbalance measurable but can soften moral conflict. Public emotion is organized through technocratic reassurance, anxiety, grievance, vulnerability, cynicism, and solidarity, showing that inequality is not only reported but affectively regulated. Economic justice is articulated through measurable equity, inclusive prosperity, spatial justice, labour dignity, anti-elite accountability, and risk-sensitive protection, revealing competing moral grammars of fairness and responsibility. Implication: These findings show that inequality discourse can clarify public problems while also limiting how suffering, blame, and redistribution are speakable. Novelty: This study advances Indonesian economic discourse research by integrating media framing, affective silence, and justice-vocabulary analysis within one coherent methodological model.
Listening to the archipelago: automatic speech recognition, accent variation, and the unequal modeling of Indonesian voices Imam Masrur
Indonesian Journal of Computational Language Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Computational sociolinguistics, speech, and digital discourse in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijcl.v1i3.1026

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s archipelagic linguistic ecology makes automatic speech recognition (ASR) a problem of sociotechnical representation, because spoken Indonesian is shaped by regional accent, local-language influence, code-switching, and uneven access to standardized speech resources. Objective: This study examines how Indonesian ASR resources, evaluation practices, and model documentation make regional and accent-varied voices differentially visible, testable, and interpretable. Method: This study applies a corpus-based ASR audit to 18 public and verifiable corpus items, combining archipelagic representation analysis, accent-sensitive error-evaluation readiness, and sociotechnical visibility assessment. Results: The corpus shows that regional-language resources are more visible than dialectal Indonesian speech directly suitable for accent-sensitive ASR evaluation. Error-evaluation readiness is uneven because several items require transcript alignment, utterance segmentation, metadata enrichment, or model-output comparison before reliable subgroup analysis can be conducted. Sociotechnical visibility is fragmented across direct speech evidence, preprocessing-dependent materials, literature-mediated findings, and model-opaque documentation. Implication: These findings reposition Indonesian ASR fairness as a question of audibility, evaluability, and linguistic justice rather than aggregate transcription accuracy alone. Novelty: This study contributes an archipelagic framework for assessing unequal machine listening in Indonesian ASR by integrating corpus representation, evaluation readiness, and sociotechnical visibility.
Trial as a speech event: turn-taking, institutional authority, and the pragmatics of Indonesian courtroom interaction Imam Masrur
Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Legal Discourse Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Courtroom interaction, testimony, and evidentiary meaning in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijll.v1i3.1032

Abstract

Background: Courtroom interaction in Indonesia constitutes an institutionally regulated speech event in which legal authority is enacted through turn allocation, questioning, repair, ratification, and pragmatic control rather than through written procedure alone. Objective: This study examines how turn-taking practices, institutional authority, and pragmatic force organize participation in Indonesian courtroom interaction. Method: This study applies a qualitative corpus-assisted design combining ethnography of communication, conversation analysis, institutional discourse analysis, and legal pragmatics to coded public courtroom transcripts, audio-visual references, and contextual judicial documents. Results: Sequential analysis shows that judicial openings and speaker selection dominate courtroom interaction, indicating that participation is procedurally activated before it becomes legally meaningful. Authority analysis demonstrates that judges exercise power through procedural initiation, floor licensing, participation repair, and institutional ratification rather than only through explicit argumentative control. Pragmatic analysis reveals that directive framing, information elicitation, clarification, minimal confirmation, and record-oriented uptake transform courtroom speech into institutional action. Implication: This study clarifies how procedural fairness depends not only on formal rights but also on interactional access, sequencing, and recognition. Novelty: This study contributes a turn-level model of Indonesian courtroom discourse that integrates speech-event structure, institutional authority, and pragmatic force within one analytically traceable framework.
Reading beyond comprehension: critical literacy, civic reasoning, and the language of educational empowerment in Indonesia Imam Masrur
Indonesian Journal of Linguistics and Educational Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Classroom discourse, student voice, and pedagogical justice in Indonesia
Publisher : CV Narasi Khatulistiwa Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67490/ijled.v1i3.1052

Abstract

Background: Indonesian education increasingly frames reading as more than comprehension, yet relationships among critical interpretation, civic judgment, and learner empowerment remain fragmented across official policy domains. Objective: This study examines how Indonesian curriculum, assessment, regulatory, and implementation documents construct critical literacy, civic reasoning, and educational empowerment. Method: A qualitative documentary design analysed 27 prescriptive documents from a verified 40-document corpus through a Critical Literacy Discourse Matrix, Civic Reasoning Matrix, and Educational Empowerment Language Scale, using one bounded excerpt per unique document. Results: Interpretive evaluation appeared in 51.9% of prescriptive documents, whereas source scrutiny and perspective plurality occurred in 25.9% and 22.2%, respectively. Claim–evidence reasoning was the most prevalent civic orientation at 55.6%, while deliberation and civic action each appeared in 22.2%. Learner agency occurred in 44.4% of documents, but explicit voice and expression appeared in only 14.8%, revealing a stronger emphasis on cognitive responsibility than public participation. Implication: Policy coherence requires closer integration of source criticism, plural perspectives, deliberative practice, and opportunities for learners to produce and communicate knowledge. Novelty: This study introduces an integrated cross-document framework that traces how Indonesian educational discourse distributes epistemic authority, civic responsibility, and participatory agency across curriculum and governance levels within Indonesia’s education system.
Co-Authors