Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan)
Nelyan Setia Zehanara
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The Effects of GeoGebra-Assisted Problem-Based Learning on Students’ Problem-Solving Skills in Solid Geometry Nelyan Setia Zehanara; Maulana Maulana; Isrok'atun Isrok'atun
Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Ainara Journal (Jurnal Penelitian dan PKM Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Wilayah (elrispeswil)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54371/ainj.v7i3.1516

Abstract

Mathematical problem-solving in solid geometry remains challenging for elementary students, highlighting the need for instruction that actively engages them in reasoning and solution development. Although Problem-Based Learning (PBL), GeoGebra, and their integration have been investigated separately, direct comparisons of these three approaches at the elementary level remain limited. This study compared their effects on fifth-grade students’ mathematical problem-solving ability using a quasi-experimental nonequivalent pretest–posttest comparison-group design. The sample comprised 102 students across three conditions: PBL (n = 33), GeoGebra-assisted learning (n = 38), and PBL assisted by GeoGebra (n = 31). Data were collected using a validated and reliable essay-based problem-solving test and analyzed using pretest, posttest, N-Gain, and Kruskal–Wallis procedures. The PBL group achieved the highest posttest mean (50.03) and N-Gain (0.38; moderate), followed by PBL assisted by GeoGebra (41.48; 0.29, low) and GeoGebra-assisted learning (38.71; 0.24, low). The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a significant difference in improvement among the three groups (p = .005). Overall, PBL showed the greatest descriptive improvement in mathematical problem-solving ability within the study context, although pairwise comparisons are required to establish which specific treatment differences were statistically significant.
Co-Authors Isrok'atun Isrok'atun Maulana Maulana