Dina Dewi Sartika Lestari Ismail
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Barawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Impact of Perceived Vulnerability and Benefits on Adolescent Smoking Cessation Motivation Setyoadi; Lala Aisyana; Efris Kartika Sari; Dina Dewi Sartika Lestari Ismail
Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Al-Hijrah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58545/jrcnp.v3i1.404

Abstract

Background: Most smoking among adolescents aged 15-19 years is associated with a psychosocial crisis, as they are still searching for their identity. Factors such as perceived vulnerability and perceived benefits can lead adolescents to start smoking. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between perceived vulnerability and perceived benefits and motivation for smoking cessation among adolescents. Methods: The research design uses an analytical observational design with a cross-sectional approach. The research sample consisted of adolescent smokers selected using a cluster random sampling technique, resulting in 136 participants. Data for variables were collected using the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease (PVD), Perceived Risks and Benefits Questionnaire (PRBQ), and Smoking Cessation Motivation Questionnaire (Q-MAT), which were modified by the researchers and tested for validity and reliability. The research data were analyzed using the Spearman Rank Test. Results: The results showed that 97.8% of participants had a positive perceived vulnerability, 97.1% had a positive perceived benefit, and 71.3% had a high motivation for smoking cessation. There was a significant relationship between perceived vulnerability and perceived benefits with motivation for smoking cessation, with a significant p-value of 0.000 and correlation values of +0.478 and +0.643. Conclusions: Adolescents' motivation to quit smoking is shaped by their awareness of health risks and the benefits of quitting, such as improved well-being and financial savings. Nursing-based interventions, including counseling, support groups, and school health campaigns, play a crucial role in reinforcing this motivation and ensuring long-term cessation.
Impact of a Structured Family Empowerment Program on Self-Efficacy and Quality of Life among Diabetes Caregivers: A Repeated-Measures Quasi-Experimental Study Setyoadi Setyoadi; Dina Dewi Sartika Lestari Ismail; Annisa Wuri Kartika; Shinta Amalia
Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): September
Publisher : Al-Hijrah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58545/jrcnp.v4i2.786

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers play a critical role in supporting patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, prolonged caregiving responsibilities may negatively affect caregivers’ self-efficacy and quality of life. Strengthening caregiver empowerment through self-efficacy-oriented interventions may improve caregivers’ confidence, coping ability, and overall well-being. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a self-efficacy-based family empowerment intervention in improving caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life among family caregivers of patients with T2DM. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test control group design with repeated measurements was conducted in community-based primary healthcare centers in Malang City, Indonesia. A total of 64 family caregivers were recruited and allocated to either the intervention group (n = 32) or the control group (n = 32). The intervention group received the “Berdaya DM” program, a structured family empowerment intervention delivered over four weekly sessions focusing on diabetes care, caregiver support strategies, stress management, and self-efficacy enhancement, whereas the control group received standard diabetes education routinely provided by the primary healthcare centers. Outcome measurements were conducted at baseline, immediately after completion of the intervention (post-test 1), and eight weeks after baseline (post-test 2). Caregiver self-efficacy was assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA to examine the effects of time, group, and time-by-group interaction. Results: Caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life improved more markedly in the intervention group than in the control group across repeated measurements. At post-test 2, mean self-efficacy scores were 32.37 ± 3.77 in the intervention group and 27.37 ± 3.77 in the control group, corresponding to a between-group mean difference of 5.00 points. Mean quality-of-life scores were 77.14 ± 7.04 and 67.14 ± 7.04, respectively, yielding a between-group mean difference of 10.00 points. Significant time-by-group interaction effects were observed for self-efficacy (F = 73.92, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.54) and quality of life (F = 82.41, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.57), indicating large intervention effects over time. Conclusion: The self-efficacy-based family empowerment intervention effectively improved caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life among family caregivers of patients with T2DM. Integrating caregiver-centered empowerment programs into primary healthcare services may strengthen sustainable diabetes management and caregiver well-being.
Impact of Perceived Vulnerability and Benefits on Adolescent Smoking Cessation Motivation Setyoadi; Lala Aisyana; Efris Kartika Sari; Dina Dewi Sartika Lestari Ismail
Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Al-Hijrah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58545/jrcnp.v3i1.404

Abstract

Background: Most smoking among adolescents aged 15-19 years is associated with a psychosocial crisis, as they are still searching for their identity. Factors such as perceived vulnerability and perceived benefits can lead adolescents to start smoking. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between perceived vulnerability and perceived benefits and motivation for smoking cessation among adolescents. Methods: The research design uses an analytical observational design with a cross-sectional approach. The research sample consisted of adolescent smokers selected using a cluster random sampling technique, resulting in 136 participants. Data for variables were collected using the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease (PVD), Perceived Risks and Benefits Questionnaire (PRBQ), and Smoking Cessation Motivation Questionnaire (Q-MAT), which were modified by the researchers and tested for validity and reliability. The research data were analyzed using the Spearman Rank Test. Results: The results showed that 97.8% of participants had a positive perceived vulnerability, 97.1% had a positive perceived benefit, and 71.3% had a high motivation for smoking cessation. There was a significant relationship between perceived vulnerability and perceived benefits with motivation for smoking cessation, with a significant p-value of 0.000 and correlation values of +0.478 and +0.643. Conclusions: Adolescents' motivation to quit smoking is shaped by their awareness of health risks and the benefits of quitting, such as improved well-being and financial savings. Nursing-based interventions, including counseling, support groups, and school health campaigns, play a crucial role in reinforcing this motivation and ensuring long-term cessation.
Impact of a Structured Family Empowerment Program on Self-Efficacy and Quality of Life among Diabetes Caregivers: A Repeated-Measures Quasi-Experimental Study Setyoadi Setyoadi; Dina Dewi Sartika Lestari Ismail; Annisa Wuri Kartika; Shinta Amalia
Journal of Rural Community Nursing Practice Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): September
Publisher : Al-Hijrah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58545/jrcnp.v4i2.786

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers play a critical role in supporting patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, prolonged caregiving responsibilities may negatively affect caregivers’ self-efficacy and quality of life. Strengthening caregiver empowerment through self-efficacy-oriented interventions may improve caregivers’ confidence, coping ability, and overall well-being. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a self-efficacy-based family empowerment intervention in improving caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life among family caregivers of patients with T2DM. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test control group design with repeated measurements was conducted in community-based primary healthcare centers in Malang City, Indonesia. A total of 64 family caregivers were recruited and allocated to either the intervention group (n = 32) or the control group (n = 32). The intervention group received the “Berdaya DM” program, a structured family empowerment intervention delivered over four weekly sessions focusing on diabetes care, caregiver support strategies, stress management, and self-efficacy enhancement, whereas the control group received standard diabetes education routinely provided by the primary healthcare centers. Outcome measurements were conducted at baseline, immediately after completion of the intervention (post-test 1), and eight weeks after baseline (post-test 2). Caregiver self-efficacy was assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA to examine the effects of time, group, and time-by-group interaction. Results: Caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life improved more markedly in the intervention group than in the control group across repeated measurements. At post-test 2, mean self-efficacy scores were 32.37 ± 3.77 in the intervention group and 27.37 ± 3.77 in the control group, corresponding to a between-group mean difference of 5.00 points. Mean quality-of-life scores were 77.14 ± 7.04 and 67.14 ± 7.04, respectively, yielding a between-group mean difference of 10.00 points. Significant time-by-group interaction effects were observed for self-efficacy (F = 73.92, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.54) and quality of life (F = 82.41, p < 0.001, partial η² = 0.57), indicating large intervention effects over time. Conclusion: The self-efficacy-based family empowerment intervention effectively improved caregiver self-efficacy and quality of life among family caregivers of patients with T2DM. Integrating caregiver-centered empowerment programs into primary healthcare services may strengthen sustainable diabetes management and caregiver well-being.