Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan
Ni Komang Yasoda Syosti Sara
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Education

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelaksanaan Program Peningkatan Kualitas Rumah Tidak Layak Huni dan Perubahan Kualitas Hidup Warga Miskin di Kabupaten Buleleng Ni Komang Yasoda Syosti Sara; I Nengah Suastika; I Wayan Budiarta
Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Oktober, Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Program Studi PPKn Jurusan Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Singaraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jmpppkn.v8i2.8510

Abstract

The Uninhabitable Housing Quality Improvement Program (RTLH) is a government effort to improve housing conditions for low-income communities. This article examines program implementation and changes in beneficiaries’ quality of life in Buleleng Regency. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach involving officials from the Buleleng Regency Housing, Settlement Areas and Land Office, village government representatives, and beneficiaries in Mengening and Depeha Villages. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, and checked through source and technique triangulation. The findings indicate that the program involves beneficiary proposals, verification, housing rehabilitation, and monitoring and evaluation. Implementation engages local and village governments, facilitators, beneficiaries, families, and community members through self-help and mutual cooperation. Challenges include administrative requirements, land status, limited funding, rising material costs, and geographical access. Beneficiaries reported improvements in housing adequacy, comfort, sense of security, self-confidence, and social relationships. Economic benefits appear indirect because changes in income and expenditure were not quantitatively measured. Overall, the program contributes to meeting basic needs and supporting beneficiaries’ welfare.  
Co-Authors I Nengah Suastika I Wayan Budiarta