Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT DESA BOKAK SEBUMBUN TERHADAP KEBERADAAN TAMAN KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI KECAMATAN SEKADAU HILIR KABUPATEN SEKADAU Murniatun, Murniatun; Zainal, Sofyan; Idham, M
JURNAL HUTAN LESTARI Vol 7, No 3 (2019): JURNAL HUTAN LESTARI
Publisher : Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/jhl.v7i3.37554

Abstract

Indonesia is a country that has a very diverse wealt in the from of the beuty of flora and fauna ecosystems and natural phenomena. Given the importance of forests to people’s lives both directly and indirectly, forest esources must be managed properly. One of these is natural resources the biodiversity park. The biodersity park is a reserve area of biological natural resource of local outside the forest area that has ex-situ and in-situ conservation, especially for plants that are pollinated or the locator is assistend bay animals with the composition and structure of vegetation that can suport the pollinator and scatter conservation seeds, there for the maintenance in biodiversity park. Therefore this study aims to examine the comunity perceptions of Bokak Sebumbun Village on the exsistence of he biodiversity park in Sekadau Hilir Subdistrict and to analize he relationship of age, knowlage and cosmopolitan factor from the perception of the Bokak Sebumbun Village to the exstence of biodiversity Parks. This study used an interview technique research method for 84 respondents to the head of the family in Bokak Sembumbun Village. Examples of respondent were conducted using purposive sampling technique. Data analysis using descriptive and inferential data analysis from the Kendall Tau correlation. The results show that people perceptions Bokak Sebumbun Village of existence biodiversity parks tend to be natural, because people basically realize that they depend on the surrounding biodiversity park. However, the comunity does not understand how to manage sustainably so that the benefits are sustainable. Keywords: Perception, Bokak Sebumbun, Biodiversity Park.
Neighboring Rights dalam Sengketa Penyiaran (Free to Air) Studi Komparasi Hukum Indonesia dan Korea Selatan Murniatun, Murniatun; Fuad, Fokky
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1759

Abstract

Broadcasting institutions as one of the creators included in the neighboring right group often face economic rights violations that cause losses of up to trillions of rupiah. It is undeniable that the value of copyrighted works of intellectual products of the human mind needs to be appreciated with an economic orientation to realise the welfare of the creators' lives. In Indonesia and South Korea, economic rights violations against copyrighted works of broadcasting occur. The case at the end of January 2024 related to organised intellectual property rights violations no longer falls into the realm of civil law but can also be charged with criminal law. The case is related to the arrest of a South Korean citizen who committed an organised copyright crime with a loss value of 19.7 billion rupiah according to a report from Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation (MBC). The research method used by the author is a statutory approach (the statue approach) using normative law or (legal research) by examining legislation in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected by means of literature study.From the research conducted by the author on the assessment of two regulations, it can be concluded that both countries apply the same rules for the protection of Neighboring Rights in accordance with the agreements in the Bern and Rome Conventions. Broadcasters have neighboring rights that are guaranteed privileges so that violations of the law can be subject to civil and criminal sanctions. The principle of Fair Use or exclusion is also applied by both countries, but no details are provided because they adopt the principle of common law where jurisprudence or previous judicial decisions become the source of law.
Neighboring Rights dalam Sengketa Penyiaran (Free to Air) Studi Komparasi Hukum Indonesia dan Korea Selatan Murniatun, Murniatun; Fuad, Fokky
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1759

Abstract

Broadcasting institutions as one of the creators included in the neighboring right group often face economic rights violations that cause losses of up to trillions of rupiah. It is undeniable that the value of copyrighted works of intellectual products of the human mind needs to be appreciated with an economic orientation to realise the welfare of the creators' lives. In Indonesia and South Korea, economic rights violations against copyrighted works of broadcasting occur. The case at the end of January 2024 related to organised intellectual property rights violations no longer falls into the realm of civil law but can also be charged with criminal law. The case is related to the arrest of a South Korean citizen who committed an organised copyright crime with a loss value of 19.7 billion rupiah according to a report from Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation (MBC). The research method used by the author is a statutory approach (the statue approach) using normative law or (legal research) by examining legislation in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected by means of literature study.From the research conducted by the author on the assessment of two regulations, it can be concluded that both countries apply the same rules for the protection of Neighboring Rights in accordance with the agreements in the Bern and Rome Conventions. Broadcasters have neighboring rights that are guaranteed privileges so that violations of the law can be subject to civil and criminal sanctions. The principle of Fair Use or exclusion is also applied by both countries, but no details are provided because they adopt the principle of common law where jurisprudence or previous judicial decisions become the source of law.