Raden Mahaputra
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Demonstrators and the Role of Legislators from the Perspective of the Historical School of Law Muhammad Urifianto Ardhan; Raden Mahaputra; Rigel Budiman; Gregorius Godfrey Gunawan
Tarumanagara Law Review Vol. 7 No. I (2025): Talrev-Untar
Publisher : Faculty of Law Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/talrev.v7iI.38869

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between public demonstrations and the role of legislators through the perspective of the historical school of law. The analysis focuses on how the frequency and intensity of demonstrations influence the legislative process and how this dynamic can be understood within a historical framework that views law as a reflection of the spirit of the people (Volksgeist). The research employs a descriptive quantitative approach, relying on secondary data drawn from academic publications, official reports, as well as nationally and internationally indexed journal articles published between 2019 and 2025. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques to map the phenomenon, complemented by correlational analysis through a synthesis of previous research findings. The results indicate that demonstrations in Indonesia significantly affect legislators’ responses, particularly regarding strategic issues such as law amendments, economic policies, and the protection of civil rights. Correlational analysis reveals a strong link between the intensity of public protests and the level of legislative responsiveness. These findings support the hypothesis that greater social pressure through demonstrations increases the likelihood of legislators aligning policies with public aspirations. Furthermore, the interaction between demonstrators and legislators is not merely a feature of modern democracy but also a continuation of Indonesia’s historical tradition in articulating collective will. The study highlights the importance of establishing formal mechanisms that integrate public aspirations into the legislative process more systematically, enabling demonstrations to serve as constructive instruments of democracy. The limitation of this research lies in its reliance solely on secondary data; thus, future studies are encouraged to incorporate primary data or longitudinal approaches. This study contributes to the development of the historical school of law while strengthening the understanding of the relationship between civil society and legislative institutions in Indonesia.