Rosalina Ikawati
Universitas Dr. Soetomo

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of Work Plan and Activity Preparation at the General Affairs Section of the Bangkalan Regency Government in 2025 Rosalina Ikawati; Priyanto Priyanto; Sapto Pramono
International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October: International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsw.v3i4.712

Abstract

This study analyses the preparation of the work plan and activities at the General Affairs Section of the Bangkalan Regency Government for the 2025 fiscal year. The study aims to examine the planning process and identify factors affecting the quality and strategic alignment of the annual work plan. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews with the section head, planning staff, and officials from regional planning and financial-management agencies. Data were also obtained through direct observation and documentation review of the 2025 work plan, work plan and budget, and related strategic documents. The analysis focused on input, process, and output dimensions based on public-sector planning theory and policy-implementation determinants. The findings indicate that the preparation of the 2025 work plan generally followed applicable regulations and was supported by committed personnel and the Regional Government Information System (SIPD). However, several challenges remain, including limited performance data, uneven planner competence, weak alignment between activities and strategic outcome targets, and reactive coordination with planning and budgeting agencies. The study recommends strengthening planner capacity, improving performance-data management, optimizing SIPD, and establishing more proactive coordination to improve the quality and strategic coherence of work-plan preparation.
Evaluating Poverty Alleviation Programs in Bangkalan Regency: A Public Policy Evaluation Perspective Rosalina Ikawati; Priyanto Priyanto; Sapto Pramono
International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): October: International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsw.v3i4.713

Abstract

Poverty in Bangkalan Regency remains among the most persistent poverty problems in East Java Province. Successive administrations have implemented various poverty alleviation programs coordinated through the Regional Poverty Reduction Coordination Team (TKPKD) within a collaborative penta-helix framework. This study evaluates the performance of these programs using William Dunn's six policy evaluation criteria: effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness, and appropriateness. A qualitative descriptive design was employed by combining documentary analysis of the 2025 official poverty profile based on Susenas time-series data from 2006 to 2025 with secondary evidence from peer-reviewed studies, official local reports, and regulations. Data were analyzed through triangulation. The findings indicate that poverty alleviation programs have been effective in the long term, as the poverty rate decreased from 33.53% in 2006 to 18.25% in March 2025, while the number of poor people declined to 187.90 thousand. However, from March 2024 to March 2025, the poverty depth index (P1) increased from 2.03 to 3.14, while the poverty severity index (P2) increased from 0.39 to 0.75. These findings indicate that although fewer people are classified as poor, those who remain are increasingly far below the poverty line. Based on Dunn's criteria, the programs demonstrate adequate effectiveness and responsiveness but remain weak in equity, adequacy, and appropriateness due to discrepancies between beneficiary datasets, the absence of uniform poverty identification standards, and limited budgets. The study recommends consolidating a validated beneficiary registry, prioritizing assistance for the poorest households, and strengthening monitoring mechanisms.