Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan
Niken Yuni Astiti
Primary Teacher Education, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
Education

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparing Paper-Based and Computer-Based Testing: A Systematic Literature Review on Their Effectiveness in Performance Assessment Meili Yanti; Irmawati M; Dea Santika Rahayu; Niken Yuni Astiti
Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan Vol 17, No 4 (2026): October
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/paedagoria.v17i4.39449

Abstract

The rapid advancement of technology has significantly influenced various aspects of human life. While these developments offer substantial convenience, they also present certain challenges, particularly during the early stages of adoption. In the field of education, technology integration is not only evident in instructional processes but also in assessment practices. One prominent example is the implementation of Computer-Based Tests (CBT), which provide several advantages; however, their effectiveness in evaluating student performance requires further examination. Accordingly, this study aims to compare the traditional Paper-Based Test (PBT) with CBT in terms of their effectiveness in performance assessment within the learning process. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach guided by two research questions: (P1) How does the effectiveness of Paper-Based Test (PBT) compare with Computer-Based Test (CBT)? and (P2) How do student performances differ between PBT and CBT? The findings from the SLR indicate mixed results. Several studies reveal that students tend to show a higher preference for CBT over PBT, accompanied by increased motivation. Nevertheless, both assessment methods appear to have no significant impact on students’ performance outcomes. Additional findings and analyses are further elaborated in this study.
Co-Authors Dea Santika Rahayu Irmawati M Meili Yanti