Jady Zaidi Hassim
National University of Malaysia (UKM), Malaysia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kepastian Hukum Frasa Kepentingan Negara dalam Naturalisasi Pemain Sepak Bola Kenneth Fabian Budimuljono; Jady Zaidi Hassim
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7319

Abstract

ABSTRACT; In recent years, the granting of citizenship to football players has increasingly been used as a tool to strengthen the national team, pursuant to Article 20 of the Citizenship Law. This provision allows the President to grant citizenship to foreign nationals based on their service to or the "national interest" of the state—subject to the consideration of the House of Representatives (DPR)—without requiring the residency period mandated for standard naturalization pathways. This article examines the legal certainty of the phrase "national interest" as applied to the naturalization of football players and proposes criteria to clarify its implementation. The study employs a normative legal approach, analyzing relevant regulations, legal concepts, and naturalization practices. While the law’s explanatory memorandum links "national interest" primarily to extraordinary contributions toward state sovereignty and progress—particularly in the economic sphere—it categorizes athletic achievements under the provision for individuals who have rendered "service" to the state (implying accomplishments already attained). In practice, however, the naturalization of players who have yet to contribute any achievements to Indonesia is often justified under the guise of "national interest." This broadens the scope for interpretation by the government and the DPR in the absence of specific, codified criteria, potentially undermining legal certainty and the clarity of the legal framework. This article proposes six parameters for defining "national interest" in the context of sports-related naturalization: the concrete needs of the national team, the player’s quality and career track record, eligibility under FIFA regulations, the player’s connection to Indonesia, their long-term commitment, and transparency regarding the rationale for the decision—all of which are recommended for inclusion in a government regulation.
Legal Authority of Navigation Districts in Ensuring Shipping Safety Based on Laws Regulations in Indonesia Jemi Baransano; Muhammad Akhdharisa; Hadi Tuasikal; Jady Zaidi Hassim
UNTAG Law Review Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Legal Review of the Authority of State Attorneys in State Administrative Cases
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v10i1.7172

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal position, sources of authority, and legal responsibilities of Navigation Districts in ensuring shipping safety based on laws and regulations in Indonesia. The Navigation District as a technical implementation unit under the Directorate General of Sea Transportation holds strategic authority in the field of navigation that directly touches the safety of human lives at sea, but the legal framework that regulates its accountability is still considered inadequate. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach, studying materials Primary law includes Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping, Government Regulation Number 5 of 2010 concerning Navigation, and Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number PM 67 of 2022, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of scientific journals and international conventions. The results of the study show that the authority of the Navigation District comes from the attribution of laws and regulations, but the existing regulatory framework contains the condition of lex imperfecta, which is the granting of large authority without being balanced by accountability and sanction mechanisms. This condition creates legal uncertainty for shipping service users while opening up potential liability demands in the dimension of international maritime law.