Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Indo-Islamika Al-'Adalah
Mudzhar, Mohamad Atho
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Use of Legal Maxims in the Fatwas of Indonesian Ulama Council Mudzhar, Mohamad Atho
JURNAL INDO-ISLAMIKA Vol 12, No 1: (2022)
Publisher : Graduate School of Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jii.v12i1.24343

Abstract

The increasing, often controversial, roles of the Indonesian Ulama Council or Majlis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) in society have attracted scholars to study the institution, including its fatwas and their arguments. This study examines how legal maxims (qawa'd fiqhiyyah) had been used to construct the arguments of MUI's fatwas. This study also identifies the legal maxims used, observes their frequencies, and determines the patterns of their application. Legal maxims are important since they show principles and logic to discover legal norms. Some 118 fatwas on ritual, Shariaheconomic, and socio-cultural issues are examined. This study found that 25 legal maxims had been used by the MUI's fatwas, with five being most frequently referred to. On average, each fatwa referred to 1.23 legal maxims. Fatwas on economic issues used most legal maxims with an average of 2.14, while those on socio-cultural and ritual issues used only 0.66 and 0.47 legal maxims on average, respectively. Fatwas on economic issues seemed to be the most dynamic ones.
SYNERGY OR CONFLICT OF LAWS? (COMPARISON BETWEEN THE COMPILATION OF RULES ON SHARI’AH ECONOMY (KHES) AND THE NATIONAL SHARI’AH BOARD’S (DSN) FATWAS) Mudzhar, Mohamad Atho
al-'adalah Vol 12 No 2 (2015): Al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v12i2.207

Abstract

Abstrak: Sinergi atau Konflik Hukum? (Perbandingan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES) dengan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional (DSN). Artikel ini membandingkan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES) yang dibuat oleh Mahkamah Agung Indonesia pada tahun 2008 dengan fatwa yang dikeluarkan oleh Dewan Syariah Nasional (DSN) Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI). Perbandingan dilakukan dalam beberapa ketentuan terutama yang menyangkut Murâbahah, Mudârabah, Ijârah, Ta’mîn, Kafâlah, Hawâlah, dan Rahn. Hal ini dilakukan karena beberapa pihak merasa khawatir jika kompilasi itu bertentangan dengan fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat konflik antara kedua regulasi di atas. Bahkan sebaliknya, mereka saling melengkapi. Perbedaan antara kedua regulasi hanya terjadi dalam tataran konseptual mengenai bentuk Murâbahah, pembatasan Murâbahah, Mushtarakah, dan definisi asuransi Syariah. Abstract: Synergy or Conflict of Laws ? (Comparison Between the Compilation of Rules on Shari’ah Economy (KHES) and the National Shari’ah Board’s (DSN) Fatwas). This article compares the Compilation of Rules on Islamic Economics (KHES) produced by the Indonesian Supreme Court in 2008 to the fatwas issued by the National Sharia Council (DSN) of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI). The comparison is made in some provisions relating to Murâbaha (a particular kind of sale), Mudhârabah (partnership in a commercial enterprise), Ijârah (rent/lease/hire contract), Ta’mîn (insurance), Kafâlah (conjoining in debt guarantee), Hawâlah (transfer of debt), and Rahn (pawning/mortgage). This is done to verify whether or not the Compilation was contrary to the fatwas of Indonesian Ulama Council. The findings shows that there is no contradiction between the two regulations. The difference occurs only in the kinds of Murâbahah, Murâbahah, and Mushtarakah, as well as the definition of Ta’mîn.
The Use of Legal Maxims in the Fatwas of Indonesian Ulama Council Mudzhar, Mohamad Atho
JURNAL INDO-ISLAMIKA Vol. 12 No. 1: (2022)
Publisher : Graduate School of UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jii.v12i1.24343

Abstract

The increasing, often controversial, roles of the Indonesian Ulama Council or Majlis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) in society have attracted scholars to study the institution, including its fatwas and their arguments. This study examines how legal maxims (qawa'd fiqhiyyah) had been used to construct the arguments of MUI's fatwas. This study also identifies the legal maxims used, observes their frequencies, and determines the patterns of their application. Legal maxims are important since they show principles and logic to discover legal norms. Some 118 fatwas on ritual, Shariaheconomic, and socio-cultural issues are examined. This study found that 25 legal maxims had been used by the MUI's fatwas, with five being most frequently referred to. On average, each fatwa referred to 1.23 legal maxims. Fatwas on economic issues used most legal maxims with an average of 2.14, while those on socio-cultural and ritual issues used only 0.66 and 0.47 legal maxims on average, respectively. Fatwas on economic issues seemed to be the most dynamic ones.
Co-Authors