Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Yuslina Yuslina
Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Digital Asset Based Prenuptial Agreements: Reconstructing Crypto Asset Regulation Through Qawāʿid Al-Fiqhiyyah Eko Pratama Putra; Yuslina Yuslina; Efendi Sugianto; Aspandi Aspandi; Wazin Wazin; Husain Husain
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam ##issue.vol## 4 ##issue.no## 2 (2026): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v4i2.136

Abstract

This article reconstructs the regulation of crypto assets in Indonesian Muslim marital property through a structured application of qawāʿid al-fiqhiyyah. It argues that economic value does not establish ownership, joint-property status, contractual validity, or Sharia permissibility. A normative legal method combines statutory interpretation, conceptual distinctions, comparative materials, and a sequence linking identified risks to relevant maxims, limiting rules, and contractual consequences. The analysis distinguishes five questions: asset status, lawful entitlement, marital classification, contractual authority, and the permissibility of the particular asset and transaction. Indonesian law already accommodates intangible joint property; the problem concerns specification, evidence, governance, and implementation rather than an absolute legal vacuum. Islamic legal maxims generate duties of disclosure, preservation, accountable management, and differentiated risk allocation, while maqāṣid al-sharīʿah evaluates their effects on wealth protection and family obligations. The resulting normative model contains operational clauses on asset schedules, tracing, consent, secure access, ordinary losses, misconduct, valuation, dissolution, and third-party safeguards. Its application to hypothetical cases demonstrates that private-key control cannot displace marital entitlement and that an agreement cannot validate prohibited investment. The proposed model is a doctrinal design for adaptation to individual circumstances, not an empirically validated instrument or a general fatwa approving cryptocurrency.
Judicial Discretion In Saudi Arabian Inheritance Law: An Analysis of Maqasid Sharia In The 2022 Codification of Personal Status Law Yuslina Yuslina; Eko Pratama Putra; Usman Usman; Wazin Wazin; Ahmad Umar; Faiz Bakhsh
Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam ##issue.vol## 4 ##issue.no## 2 (2026): November
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52496/mjhki.v4i2.137

Abstract

This article examines how Saudi Arabia’s 2022 Personal Status Law allocates judicial authority in inheritance disputes. It argues that codification neither abolishes discretion nor uniformly converts substantive justice into procedural formalism. A doctrinal method interprets selected provisions on estate identification, succession eligibility, fixed shares, preservation, negotiated withdrawal, and residual Sharia reference. The statutory analysis is supplemented by two identifiable Saudi judgments published before codification and a focused comparison with Indonesian succession provisions and a 2024 Pakistani judgment. The findings distinguish legislative selection of distributive rules from judicial determination of facts, expressly delegated evaluations, and supplementary reasoning under article 251. Articles 238–240 prescribe protective measures, whereas article 244 expressly entrusts the court with a context-sensitive assessment of the time needed to ascertain an estate. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah is reconstructed as a framework for evaluating authorized choices, preserving entitlement, and requiring reasons, rather than a general permission to alter inheritance fractions. The article proposes a model of bounded purposive discretion requiring identification of legal authority, relevant facts, permissible alternatives, and safeguards for affected parties. Published cases demonstrate the practical importance of asset verification, protection of absent heirs and minors, and appellate correction. Because the Saudi cases predate the statute, they establish an institutional baseline rather than prove post-2022 effects. The contribution is a differentiated account of where judicial discretion survives, how it is constrained, and how its exercise can be evaluated.
Co-Authors Ahmad Umar Aspandi, Aspandi Efendi Sugianto Eko Pratama Putra Faiz Bakhsh Husain Husain Usman Usman Wazin Wazin Wazin Wazin