<![CDATA[Pembelajaran fisika menuntut pemahaman konsep abstrak melalui pengamatan, representasi, dan pengalaman belajar yang bermakna. Teknologi digital menawarkan sarana visualisasi, simulasi, dan aktivitas interaktif untuk mendukung proses pembelajaran tersebut. Namun, penerapannya dalam pendidikan fisika menunjukkan keragaman jenis teknologi, fungsi pedagogis, aktivitas, serta capaian pembelajaran yang perlu dipetakan secara sistematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan pemanfaatan teknologi digital dalam pendidikan fisika melalui Systematic Literature Review terhadap publikasi periode 2016–2025. Pencarian dilakukan melalui basis data Scopus menggunakan dua kueri dan kriteria seleksi berdasarkan pedoman PRISMA. Dari 321 rekaman awal, sebanyak 80 artikel memenuhi kriteria dan ditetapkan sebagai korpus akhir penelitian. Data diekstraksi dan dikodekan berdasarkan jenis teknologi digital, fungsi pedagogis, aktivitas pembelajaran, serta capaian pembelajaran peserta didik. Frekuensi dan persentase digunakan untuk pemetaan deskriptif, sedangkan sintesis interpretatif digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi kesenjangan penelitian. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa simulasi dan laboratorium virtual merupakan teknologi paling banyak diteliti, ditemukan dalam 20 artikel atau 25% korpus. Visualisasi dan pemodelan konsep menjadi fungsi pedagogis paling dominan, dilaporkan dalam 37 artikel atau 46,25%. Kuis, tes, dan asesmen berulang merupakan aktivitas paling sering dilaporkan, mencakup 18 artikel atau 22,5%. Eksperimen, praktikum, dan analisis data menyusul dengan 16 artikel atau 20% dari keseluruhan korpus. Motivasi, minat, keterlibatan, dan sikap menjadi kelompok capaian pembelajaran paling banyak dikaji, ditemukan dalam 24 artikel atau 30%. Sintesis mengidentifikasi empat kesenjangan, yaitu kejelasan konseptual, kedalaman integrasi pedagogis, keluasan capaian pembelajaran, dan konsistensi bukti penelitian. Kesenjangan tersebut menegaskan perlunya kejelasan konsep, integrasi pedagogis, pengukuran capaian beragam, serta pelaporan hasil transparan. Temuan ini dapat membantu pendidik memilih teknologi berdasarkan tujuan pembelajaran dan membantu peneliti merancang kajian lebih terarah. Kajian ini terbatas pada Scopus dan publikasi 2016–2025, sehingga cakupan temuannya perlu ditafsirkan secara proporsional. Penelitian mendatang perlu memperluas sumber literatur dan menguji hubungan antardimensi melalui bukti empiris beragam. Abstract Physics learning requires students to understand abstract concepts through observation, representation, and meaningful learning experiences. Digital technology offers visualization, simulation, and interactive activities to support these learning processes. However, its implementation in physics education demonstrates variations in technology types, pedagogical functions, learning activities, and learning outcomes that require systematic mapping. This study aims to map the utilization of digital technology in physics education through a Systematic Literature Review of publications from 2016 to 2025. The literature search was conducted using the Scopus database with two search queries and selection criteria based on PRISMA guidelines. Of the 321 initial records, 80 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final corpus. Data were extracted and coded based on digital technology types, pedagogical functions, learning activities, and students' learning outcomes. Frequencies and percentages were used for descriptive mapping, while interpretive synthesis was employed to identify research gaps. The findings indicate that simulations and virtual laboratories were the most frequently studied technologies, appearing in 20 articles or 25% of the corpus. Visualization and conceptual modeling were the dominant pedagogical functions, reported in 37 articles or 46.25%. Quizzes, tests, and repeated assessments were the most frequently reported learning activities, accounting for 18 articles or 22.5%. Experiments, practical activities, and data analysis followed, appearing in 16 articles or 20% of the corpus. Motivation, interest, engagement, and attitudes represented the most frequently examined learning outcomes, identified in 24 articles or 30%. The synthesis identified four research gaps: conceptual clarity, depth of pedagogical integration, breadth of learning outcomes, and consistency of research evidence. These gaps highlight the need for clearer concepts, stronger pedagogical integration, broader outcome measurement, and more transparent reporting of research findings. These findings can help educators select technologies based on learning objectives and assist researchers in designing more focused studies. This review is limited to Scopus-indexed publications from 2016 to 2025, so its findings should be interpreted proportionally. Future research should expand literature sources and examine relationships across dimensions through more diverse empirical evidence.]]>
