Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Journal of Law and Social Politics
Lusi Apriyani
Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Reorienting the Agrarian Law: The Role of Agrarian Law in the Life of the Nation, State and Government Firman Muntaqo; Alip Dian Pratama; Febrian Febrian; Mada Apriandi Zuhir; Lusi Apriyani
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42 No 4 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/egm0v225

Abstract

This article critically examines the reorientation of Indonesian agrarian law, particularly land law, in light of the deviation from its foundational values of unity and social justice. Using a normative legal research method with a conceptual and statutory approach, this study analyzes the historical trajectory of agrarian legislation, the persistence of colonial doctrines such as domein verklaring, and the impact of recent regulations including the Job Creation Law and Presidential Decree No. 75/2024. The findings reveal that land—originally positioned as a national asset grounded in adat law and religious-magical values—has increasingly been commodified and subjected to sectoral legal fragmentation. This shift has weakened community access and ulayat rights, while favoring legal entities and foreign capital. The study argues for a reorientation of agrarian legal politics that restores land as a national asset in accordance with the 1945 Constitution, the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), and the values of the 1928 Youth Pledge. Such reorientation is essential to safeguard indigenous rights, strengthen legal certainty, and ensure that land governance serves the greatest prosperity of the people.
Harmonizing the Principles of the EU AI Act with Indonesian AUPB for Transparent Algorithmic Governance Vegitya Ramadhani Putri; Ridwan Ridwan; Zulhidayat Zulhidayat; Lusi Apriyani
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i5.291

Abstract

Background: The digitalization of government procurement through Indonesia’s E-Catalog system has shifted certain functions traditionally performed by human bureaucrats to algorithmic systems that exercise what may be termed “algorithmic discretion” in product ranking and recommendation. Legal challenges arise because Indonesia’s administrative law framework, particularly Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, remains largely anthropocentric and inadequately addresses algorithmic systems acting as “invisible bureaucrats.” This creates an accountability gap when algorithmic decisions produce hidden biases that adversely affect providers’ rights. Objective: This research aims to harmonize the right-to-explanation principle under the EU AI Act and Canada’s Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) framework with Indonesia’s General Principles of Good Governance (Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, AUPB) to formulate a doctrine of “Administrative Due Process for Algorithms.” Methods: This research employs comparative legal analysis to examine the Canadian AIA framework and the EU AI Act in relation to Indonesia’s administrative law framework. Results: The findings indicate that the AUPB principles of diligence (kecermatan) and openness (keterbukaan) can be operationalized as obligations to audit black-box algorithms, giving rise to a new theoretical construct termed “Algorithmic Administrative Law.” This approach shifts the focus of administrative oversight from the examination of physical documents to the auditing of algorithmic logic. Conclusion: This research recommends amending Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration to explicitly address decisions made through automated decision-making systems, as well as adopting an AIA protocol through Indonesia’s National Public Procurement Agency (Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah, LKPP) as a mandatory audit mechanism before algorithmic ranking systems are deployed for public use.
Co-Authors Alip Dian Pratama Febrian Febrian Firman Muntaqo Mada Apriandi Zuhir Ridwan Ridwan Vegitya Ramadhani Putri Zulhidayat Zulhidayat