Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosio Konsepsia Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada)
Vegitya Ramadhani Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PERKAWINAN WANITA USIA DINI PADA KELUARGA MISKIN DI PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN Evy Ratna Kartika Waty; Vegitya Ramadhani Putri
Sosio Konsepsia Vol 14 No 3 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial
Publisher : Puslitbangkesos Kementerian Sosial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33007/ska.v14i3.711

Abstract

Child marriage mostly happens in rural societies with many circumstances. Education's less-access, poverty, isolated-area, jobless are many factors that influencing child-marriages. From socio-economic aspect, these kinds of marriages causing school-drop-out, less life-skill, less knowledge, less self-confidence, and less job participation. That problem is most consequential to women that involve on child-marriages. Those condition impact to family's poverty and economic-dependency. Women with child-marriage also have suffered with negative on their reproduction health. Most of child-marriage happens btj manipulation of ages and time of their birth, which is as important condition to be a legal marriage. This research found that this child-marriage is psychological and physical violence. Women as teenagers whom in child-marriages are forced to involve in adult life in most of them had emotional depression and faced many socialeconomy difficulties.
SIGNIFIKANSI ALAT BUKTI TERTULIS SEBAGAI PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS KASUS PERCERAIAN: Kajian Putusan Nomor 153/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Yyk Ramadhan, Muhammad Syahri; Putri, Vegitya Ramadhani; Yuningsih, Henny
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Child Protection
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v17i2.634

Abstract

Tulisan ini menganalisis pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 153/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Yyk yang memutus perkara perceraian, yang mencerminkan dinamika kompleks dalam konflik rumah tangga. Penggugat mengalami tekanan psikologis yang signifikan akibat tindakan tergugat, yang mencakup perbuatan tercela seperti perselingkuhan, alkoholisme, dan perjudian. Tindakan tersebut tidak hanya menyebabkan tergugat gagal memenuhi kewajiban nafkah, tetapi juga merusak kestabilan emosional dan ekonomi penggugat serta anak-anak mereka. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya alat bukti tertulis dalam proses litigasi, khususnya dalam pengajuan klaim nafkah anak dan biaya pendidikan, yang merupakan hak asasi fundamental bagi anak-anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan preskriptif, yang memungkinkan analisis mendalam terhadap ketentuan hukum yang relevan, termasuk undang-undang tentang perkawinan dan peraturan pelaksanaannya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keputusan hakim didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum yang mewajibkan penggugat untuk menyertakan bukti tertulis yang berkaitan dengan pendapatan tergugat sebagai dasar penetapan kewajiban finansial. Penelitian ini menggarisbawahi bahwa alat bukti tertulis memegang peranan sentral dalam pembuktian perkara perdata dan mengonfirmasi perlunya substansi serta legitimasi bukti dalam mencapai keadilan di pengadilan. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penguatan legitimasi dan keabsahan bukti dalam proses hukum sangat penting, demikian pula urgensi bagi para pihak dalam perkara perceraian untuk mempersiapkan bukti yang memadai demi mencapai putusan yang adil.
A Legal Review of the Limitation of Citizens' Constitutional Rights During a Global Health Emergency Dwi Saleha; Putri, Vegitya Ramadhani; Lestaluhu, Rajab
Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL AR RO'IS MANDALIKA (ARMADA)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/armada.v5i1.5383

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to legal systems and the protection of constitutional rights globally. Restrictions on fundamental rights, such as freedom of movement, assembly, and work, imposed by governments to protect public health, have sparked debates on the extent to which constitutional rights can be limited during a global health emergency. This study aims to analyze how different legal systems in various countries address the limitation of constitutional rights during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on the principles of necessity, proportionality, and non-discrimination in the framework of international human rights law. Using a qualitative approach through literature study and library research, this article examines various constitutional legal frameworks, emergency laws, and the application of relevant international human rights principles. The findings show that although many countries have constitutional provisions allowing for the restriction of certain rights during emergencies, the application of the principles of proportionality and necessity varies. The study also highlights the critical role of judicial oversight to ensure that rights limitations are not excessive and are applied fairly, and the importance of aligning national laws with international human rights standards. The implications of this research suggest the need for long-term legal reforms to ensure just and non-discriminatory limitations of rights in future global health emergencies.
Co-Authors Dwi Saleha Rajab Lestaluhu Ramadhan, Muhammad Syahri Waty, Evy Ratna Kartika Yuningsih, Henny