Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sosio Konsepsia Mandalika Law Journal Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada)
Vegitya Ramadhani Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PERKAWINAN WANITA USIA DINI PADA KELUARGA MISKIN DI PROVINSI SUMATERA SELATAN Evy Ratna Kartika Waty; Vegitya Ramadhani Putri
Sosio Konsepsia Vol 14 No 3 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial
Publisher : Puslitbangkesos Kementerian Sosial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33007/ska.v14i3.711

Abstract

Child marriage mostly happens in rural societies with many circumstances. Education's less-access, poverty, isolated-area, jobless are many factors that influencing child-marriages. From socio-economic aspect, these kinds of marriages causing school-drop-out, less life-skill, less knowledge, less self-confidence, and less job participation. That problem is most consequential to women that involve on child-marriages. Those condition impact to family's poverty and economic-dependency. Women with child-marriage also have suffered with negative on their reproduction health. Most of child-marriage happens btj manipulation of ages and time of their birth, which is as important condition to be a legal marriage. This research found that this child-marriage is psychological and physical violence. Women as teenagers whom in child-marriages are forced to involve in adult life in most of them had emotional depression and faced many socialeconomy difficulties.
A Legal Review of the Limitation of Citizens' Constitutional Rights During a Global Health Emergency Dwi Saleha; Putri, Vegitya Ramadhani; Lestaluhu, Rajab
Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL AR RO'IS MANDALIKA (ARMADA)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/armada.v5i1.5383

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to legal systems and the protection of constitutional rights globally. Restrictions on fundamental rights, such as freedom of movement, assembly, and work, imposed by governments to protect public health, have sparked debates on the extent to which constitutional rights can be limited during a global health emergency. This study aims to analyze how different legal systems in various countries address the limitation of constitutional rights during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on the principles of necessity, proportionality, and non-discrimination in the framework of international human rights law. Using a qualitative approach through literature study and library research, this article examines various constitutional legal frameworks, emergency laws, and the application of relevant international human rights principles. The findings show that although many countries have constitutional provisions allowing for the restriction of certain rights during emergencies, the application of the principles of proportionality and necessity varies. The study also highlights the critical role of judicial oversight to ensure that rights limitations are not excessive and are applied fairly, and the importance of aligning national laws with international human rights standards. The implications of this research suggest the need for long-term legal reforms to ensure just and non-discriminatory limitations of rights in future global health emergencies.
The Role of the Ministry of Law in Harmonizing National Legislation and International Legal Standards Haning, Semuel; Putri, Vegitya Ramadhani; Indriasari, Evy
Jurnal Ar Ro'is Mandalika (Armada) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): JURNAL AR RO'IS MANDALIKA (ARMADA)
Publisher : Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/armada.v6i3.6241

Abstract

This study examines the role of the Ministry of Law in harmonizing national legislation with international legal standards, focusing on the challenges and mechanisms involved in aligning domestic laws with global norms. With increasing globalization, countries are increasingly required to adjust their legal systems to comply with international treaties and agreements. This research aims to explore how the Ministry of Law facilitates this process, addressing the political, legal, and institutional challenges that arise in the harmonization process. A qualitative literature review was conducted, analyzing relevant academic sources, governmental reports, and case studies from various countries. The findings reveal that while the Ministry of Law plays a pivotal role in implementing international legal standards, its success is often contingent on institutional capacity, political will, and the ability to balance national interests with international obligations. The study concludes that a strategic, well-supported Ministry of Law is essential for effective legal harmonization. Strengthening the Ministry’s capacity and fostering intergovernmental cooperation are key to overcoming resistance and ensuring compliance with international legal standards, ultimately enhancing global legal cooperation and governance.
Digitalization of the Judiciary and Its Impact on Criminal Procedure Law Reform Haning, Semuel; Latianingsih, Nining; Budiyanto, Budiyanto; Wilsa, Wilsa; Putri, Vegitya Ramadhani
Mandalika Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Mandalika Law Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Baru Haji Samsudin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/mlj.v3i2.6194

Abstract

The digitalization of the judiciary has significantly transformed criminal justice systems worldwide, introducing both efficiency and new legal challenges. This research explores the impact of judicial digitalization on criminal procedure law, specifically focusing on how digital technologies affect procedural practices, legal safeguards, and fundamental rights. The study aims to identify key areas where criminal procedure law must be reformed to accommodate digital practices without compromising fairness, transparency, and due process. Using a library-based research method, this study analyzes relevant literature, legal texts, and case studies to assess the implications of digital tools such as virtual hearings and digital evidence management. Findings indicate that while judicial digitalization enhances efficiency and access to justice, it also creates legal uncertainties, particularly concerning data privacy, digital evidence handling, and the protection of defendants' rights. The research concludes that comprehensive legal reform is necessary to align criminal procedure law with the realities of digital justice, ensuring that technological advancements contribute to, rather than undermine, fair and transparent criminal proceedings.
Co-Authors Budiyanto Budiyanto Dwi Saleha Haning, Semuel Indriasari, Evy Nining Latianingsih Rajab Lestaluhu Waty, Evy Ratna Kartika Wilsa, Wilsa