Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Digging Into the Philosophy of Malay-Palembang Local Wisdom and Student Cultural Affection: A Critical Phenomenological Approach Izzah; Hani Atus Sholikhah; Ernalida; Zahra Alwi; Chrisnatama Tangguh Prasetyo
Proceeding International Conference on Education Volume 04, Agustus Tahun 2026: International Conference on Education
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syekh Wasil Kediri, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Traditional higher education curricula often reduce regional languages to static mechanical structures, stripping away the profound philosophical worldviews embedded within indigenous heritage. In Palembang, South Sumatra, rapid urban modernization risks severing the younger generation's connection to their ancestors' existential wisdom, thereby triggering cultural alienation. Nurturing an intimate love, emotional proximity, and long-term pride among modern undergraduate students toward the Malay-Palembang language and literature requires a pedagogical shift toward a deep interrogation of regional philosophy. Unfortunately, empirical studies exploring how youth phenomenologically internalize this ancestral philosophy to cultivate authentic cultural affection remain highly scarce. This critical phenomenological study investigates how 100 undergraduate students perceive the philosophical potential of Malay-Palembang language and literature, and how they frame their future aspirations to foster deeper cultural affection.  A qualitative critical phenomenological design was employed to examine the lived experiences of 100 undergraduate students majoring in Indonesian Language and Literature Education at Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang. Data were gathered through in-depth reflective journals, philosophical essays, and semi-structured focus group discussions, followed by a rigorous critical thematic analysis. The analysis revealed eight primary dimensions: (1) Linguistic Identity Affect, proving that deconstructing philosophical etymology fosters a deep love for the mother tongue; (2) Ethical Oral Tradition Philosophy, utilizing the ethical values in Senjang for character building; (3) Eco-Philosophical River Epistemology, connecting the philosophy of the Musi River with contemporary environmental ethics; (4) Philosophical Materialization of Physical Heritage, interpreting the metaphysical meanings behind Songket motifs and Limas architecture; (5) Philosophy-Based Curriculum, demanding a transition from rigid grammar to wisdom-based learning; (6) Affective-Aesthetic Pedagogy, encouraging emotional immersion in regional arts to ignite cultural passion; (7) Institutional Philosophical Sanctuary, expecting universities to formally protect indigenous knowledge systems; and (8) Global Ontological Diplomacy, aspiring to share the existential philosophy of Malay-Palembang with international audiences.
Effect of Case-Based Learning Assisted by the Tutura Application on University Students' Pragmatic Analysis Skills Tressyalina; Ernalida; Atika Zikri
Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran
Publisher : Bale Literasi: Lembaga Riset, Pelatihan & Edukasi, Sosial, Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/alinea.v6i3.4374

Abstract

Pragmatic analysis is important for Indonesian Language Education students because prospective language teachers need to interpret language use appropriately across different communicative contexts. However, pragmatic instruction in higher education may provide limited opportunities for students to analyze authentic communicative situations and connect pragmatic concepts with contextual language use. Previous studies have examined case-based learning, technology-enhanced pragmatic learning, and AI-assisted language learning separately, but limited empirical research has investigated their integration specifically for developing university students’ pragmatic analysis skills. This study aimed to examine the difference in pragmatic analysis skills between Indonesian Language Education students who participated in Case-Based Learning assisted by the Tutura application and those who received conventional instruction. A quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group design was employed. The participants consisted of 66 fourth-semester Indonesian Language Education students, including 32 students from Universitas Negeri Padang as the experimental group and 34 students from Universitas Sriwijaya as the control group. Data were collected using a pragmatic analysis skills test administered as a pretest and posttest and analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, Levene’s test, the Independent Samples t-test, normalized gain (N-Gain), and Cohen’s d. The experimental group’s mean score increased from 75.50 to 92.50, whereas the control group’s mean score increased from 77.38 to 87.38. The Independent Samples t-test indicated a statistically significant difference in posttest scores between the two groups, t(64) = 11.812, p < .001. The experimental group also showed a higher N-Gain score (0.694) than the control group (0.37), while the reported Cohen’s d was 2.91. These findings indicate greater observed improvement in pragmatic analysis skills among students who participated in Case-Based Learning assisted by the Tutura application. The findings suggest that integrating case-based pragmatic analysis with an AI-assisted learning resource may support contextual pragmatic learning in Indonesian Language Education. However, because the groups were drawn from different institutions and were not randomly assigned, the observed difference cannot be attributed exclusively to the instructional intervention.