Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan
Suci Wulan Pawhestri
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Efektivitas Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X pada Pembelajaran Biologi: Systematic Literature Review Siti Nuraini; Suci Wulan Pawhestri; Iqlima Amelia
SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July-September | SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan
Publisher : WISE Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70211/sakalima.v3i3.690

Abstract

Critical thinking is essential in biology education, yet empirical evidence concerning the effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) among Grade 10 students remains fragmented across different instructional approaches and research designs. This study aimed to synthesize empirical findings on the effectiveness of PBL in developing students’ critical thinking skills in biology education. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework. Articles were retrieved from Google Scholar and Scopus using Publish or Perish. Of 158 identified records, 10 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2024 were included in the narrative and thematic synthesis. The findings revealed consistently positive trends in critical thinking outcomes across standalone PBL and PBL integrated with collaborative strategies, STEM-based worksheets, and digital learning media. Improvements were reported in students’ interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation skills, while self-regulation required more explicit reflective activities. However, methodological heterogeneity and variations in assessment instruments limited direct comparisons and causal interpretations. These findings imply that biology teachers should implement PBL through authentic problems, structured inquiry, evidence-based discussions, appropriate instructional scaffolding, and formative assessment to support students’ critical thinking development.
Efektivitas Model Learning Cycle dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA: Sistematic Literature Review Veni Pangestu; Suci Wulan Pawhestri; Ahmad Mughofar
SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): July-September | SAKALIMA: Pilar Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pendidikan
Publisher : WISE Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70211/sakalima.v3i3.691

Abstract

Scientific literacy is essential for developing students’ ability to interpret scientific evidence, explain natural phenomena, and make informed decisions. However, empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of the 9E Learning Cycle in enhancing scientific literacy remains limited. This study aimed to systematically synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of the 9E Learning Cycle, supported by findings from the 5E and 7E models. A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of 162 identified records, 10 articles published between 2018 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed through narrative and thematic synthesis. The findings comprised five studies on 5E, three on 7E, and two on 9E, indicating generally positive scientific literacy outcomes. Specifically, the 9E studies reported N-gain values ranging from 0.59 to 0.70, suggesting improvements in scientific explanation, evidence interpretation, and conceptual understanding. Nevertheless, both studies integrated Islamic values, limiting conclusions about the independent effectiveness of the 9E model. These findings highlight the potential of the 9E Learning Cycle and imply that biology educators should integrate structured inquiry, formative feedback, and digital information evaluation while further comparative research establishes its distinct instructional contributions.
Co-Authors Ahmad Mughofar Iqlima Amelia Siti Nuraini Veni Pangestu