Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

PERAN ASEAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS SEBAGAI INSTITUSI HAM ASEAN: KASUS ROHINGYA DI MYANMAR 2012-2016 Saputra, Oddie Bagus; Utomo, Tri Cahyo
Journal of International Relations Volume 5, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019
Publisher : International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (511.459 KB)

Abstract

This research explains and analyzes the role of the AICHR as an ASEAN Human Rights Institution in its engagement in the Rohingya case in Myanmar for the period 2012-2016. The purpose of this research is to explain the causes of human rights violations against Rohingya ethnicities, the involvement of the AICHR in that case and the obstacles faced by AICHR in their involvement. This research uses qualitative research methods to provide answers by describing the facts related to Rohingya case and the AICHR’s efforts to get involved in the case. The frame of mind used in this study is the paradigm of Institutional Liberalism, concept of International Organization, and concept of International Regime.   Researcher found that the involvement of AICHR in the Rohingya case was limited to being used as a forum or meeting place for its member countries to discuss and gather information regarding the case. This is due to the presence of internal AICHR factors including limited authority or mandate, lack of independence of members and an inefficient and effective consensus system. Meanwhile, external factors originated from the application of the ideology of socialism by Myanmar which caused this country to become closed so that AICHR had difficulty in obtaining and collecting information related to the Rohingya case.
ANALYSIS OF US-NATO ENTANGLEMENT IN RUSSO-UKRAINIAN CONFLICT: 'WESTERN AXIS' AN EFFORT TO CONTAIN CHINA IN EUROPE Maulidina, Syifa; Saputra, Oddie Bagus
Journal of Terrorism Studies Vol. 5, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Ukraine-Russia conflict is a complex one. Some countries intend to defend national interests regarding border areas, energy sources, and international trade routes such as the United States, NATO, and China. The United States-NATO is trying to maintain the status quo over the Euro-Arctic region. Meanwhile, China took advantage of this conflict to expand into the European market. In addition, China has also benefited in the military sector to modernize its military arsenal and cheap energy sources amid the global energy crisis from Russia. Therefore, to help the process of analyzing the issue, this study uses the concept of balancing to see how the US-NATO shapes the perception of threats to China. Henceforth, both know what form of deterrence and containment strategy to employ in their involvement in the Ukraine-Russian conflict, especially to stem China's expansion in the Caucasus and Arctic regions.
State Hegemony In Global Civil Society: The Articulation Of Indonesia's Ecpat Hegemony In The Process Of Securitization Of Child Sexual Exploitation Saputra, Oddie Bagus; Sesarianto, Kevin Ali; Octaviana, Cindy Angie; Mafaza R, Zelda
Journal of World Science Vol. 3 No. 9 (2024): Journal of World Science
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jws.v3i9.723

Abstract

The process of securitization of anti-child sexual exploitation norms (anti-ESA) carried out by ECPAT Indonesia relies on two hegemonic discourses, namely the global hegemonic discourse on children's rights and the political discourse on state hegemony. Looking at using the Securitization Theory, this study finds that ECPAT Indonesia disseminates the ESA threat to the local community as a securitization audience but without conducting equivalent socialization. This inequality arises due to the securitization model carried out by ECPAT Indonesia which is imposing through state hegemony instead of accommodating differences in norm structures between global and local communities. This argument is supported by using critical discourse analysis that looks at interviews with ECPAT Indonesia and the press releases they issue. In researching this issue, this study finds that ECPAT Indonesia does design their operations by utilizing the two hegemonies that have been mentioned.
The Political Influence of US and China Vaccine Competition in Southeast Asia on Potential New Security Issues for ASEAN Countries Saputra, Oddie Bagus; Larasati, Ria Agustina
Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023): Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Institute of Social and Political Science Jakarta (Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta - IISIP Jakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36451/jisip.v20i1.12

Abstract

Vaccine competition between the United States and China in Southeast Asia has been potential to create new security problems for ASEAN member states. Based on the constructivism perspective and Regional Security Complex Theory (RSC), this article analyses the relationships between the identity and interest of both states, US and China, who took certain policies and engaged in the vaccine competition in the Southeast Asian region. China with the political manoeuvre and US with the humanitarian endeavour in their narration, both had interests in terms of economic, politics, also geopolitics through their assistance to ASEAN countries. The authors argue that new security problems, such as the rising unemployment rates, the declining GDP, and the new pandemic wave, caused by this competition are the result of the absence of collective identity of ASEAN countries. Instead of prioritizing their collective identity as a regional community and forming regional security complex, ASEAN countries tend to respond by prioritizing their respective national interests. Therefore, this article offers the recipes where ASEAN member state should establish their collective identity, such as supporting the development of ASEAN vaccines in Vietnam and Thailand or establishing the ASEAN pharmaceutical company designates as the regional vaccine research and development site.
Perbedaan Kebijakan Indonesia dan Vietnam di Tengah Kompetisi Vaksin Cina dan Amerika Serikat di Era Pandemi Covid-19 Saputra, Oddie Bagus
Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Publisher : Institute of Social and Political Science Jakarta (Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Jakarta - IISIP Jakarta)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36451/jisip.v21i1.307

Abstract

Tulisan ini berusaha untuk menjelaskan faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan terjadinya diferensiasi kebijakan antara Vietnam dan Indonesia dalam merespons kompetisi vaksin Cina dan Amerika Serikat. Konsep foreign policy decision making (FPDM) dari Alex Mintz dan Karl DeRouen Jr digunakan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memotivasi Vietnam maupun Indonesia untuk menerapkan kebijakan (balancing maupun bandwagoning). Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah  studi kasus pada dua negara di kawasan Asia Tenggara yakni Vietnam dan Indonesia. Analisi ini menemukan bahwa Vietnam menerapkan kebijakan balancing dipengaruhi oleh pengalaman dalam memproduksi vaksin penyakit sebelumnya, advisory group (special working group Kemenkes, pengusaha, dan pengembang vaksin); ketidakpercayaan masyarakat Vietnam terhadap vaksin Cina dan kecurigaan terhadap isu Laut Cina Selatan; pemulihan status sebagai emerging middle power. Sementara itu, kebijakan bandwagoning Indonesia terkonstruksi oleh keterbatasan informasi dan waktu, advisory group (Menlu Retno Marsudi dan Presiden Joko Widodo), opini publik mengenai program vaksinasi, kepentingan ekonomi, vaccine nationalism, dan keterlambatan distribusi vaksin AstraZeneca.