Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Penguatan Kapasitas Kelembagaan Desa Beran Melalui Pendampingan Pembentukan Peraturan Desa Berbasis Meaningful Participation Lathisa Nazwa Shalsabila Azzahra; Mohammad Rafli Hidayat; Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma
Jurnal Nusantara Berbakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Oktober: Jurnal Nusantara Berbakti
Publisher : Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/jnb.v4i4.861

Abstract

This community service initiative aims to strengthen the institutional capacity of Beran Village, Ngawi Regency, in the formulation of village regulations based on the principle of "meaningful participation." The activity involved 30 participants aged 20–45, comprising both village officials and community members. The implementation process included planning, identifying institutional needs and challenges, developing materials, conducting outreach, facilitating interactive discussions, providing guidance on identifying regulatory needs, deliberating on content and drafting norms, and performing an evaluation. Data were collected through observation, discussion outcomes, participant feedback, and documentation, and were subsequently analyzed using a descriptive qualitative approach to evaluate the results of the assistance provided. No formal evaluation instrument is mentioned in the text. The outcomes of the activity included the identification of local issues, the discussion of proposals based on their urgency and the village's authority, and the facilitation of the submission and consideration of community aspirations, supported by evidence of the process. The discussions emphasized three core elements of meaningful participation: the right to be heard, the right to have one's input considered, and the right to receive an explanation regarding how that input was addressed. As the text does not report any specific written outputs or "before-and-after" measurements, it is not possible to definitively quantify changes in the participants' understanding or the impact on the quality of the resulting regulations.