Akbar, Mohammad Rizki
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparison of Left Ventricular Function after His Bundle Pacing vs Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Implantation Prakoso, Kurniawan; Wibawa, Kevin; Karwiky, Giky; Akbar, Mohammad Rizki; Martha, Januar Wibawa; Iqbal, Mohammad
Jurnal Kardiologi Indonesia Vol 45 No 2 (2024): April - June, 2024
Publisher : The Indonesian Heart Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30701/ijc.1708

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular pacing may lead to deterioration of left ventricular (LV) function. Recent guideline suggests the use of conduction system pacing (CSP) with either his bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). This study aimed to investigate the difference of LV function between HBP and LBBAP. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study enrolling patients age >18 years requiring CSP implantation from June 2020 to January 2024 in Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung. Data regarding QRS duration and several echocardiography parameters were obtained at baseline and during follow up within 1 year after CSP implantation. Results: From 66 patients, 35 were included in the HBP group. There was no difference in QRS duration at baseline between both groups with higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in HBP group (51.2 ± 13.9% vs 45.6 ± 11.1%, p=0.078). During follow up, HBP group showed narrower QRS duration (113.40 ± 17.06ms vs 120.81 ± 12.12ms, p=0.029). LV function was preserved in HBP group while there was a trend of LV function improvement in LBBAP group (53.1 ± 11.7% in LBBAP vs 53.9 ± 11.5% in HBP group, p=0.536). Further analysis in 33 patients with LV dysfunction showed a trend of LVEF improvement in both groups (35.3 ± 7.9% to 44.6 ± 11.28% in HBP and 38.7 ± 6.9% to 51.4 ± 13.1% in LBBAP group). Conclusion: HBP resulted in narrower QRS complex. However, both HBP and LBBAP showed a trend of LV function improvement in patients with LV dysfunction.
Mexiletine in the treatment of LQT2, LQT3, and acquired LQTS: a meta-analysis Ihsan, Dhiya; Iqbal, Mohammad; Cool, Charlotte Johanna; Achmad, Chaerul; Pramudyo, Miftah; Prameswari, Hawani Sasmaya; Akbar, Mohammad Rizki
Jurnal Kardiologi Indonesia Vol 46 No 2 (2025): April - June, 2025
Publisher : The Indonesian Heart Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30701/ijc.1835

Abstract

Background: High mortality in patients with Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) can be reduced with proper treatment. Gene-specific therapy is crucial, as many treatments are not equally effective across different LQTS types. While mexiletine has been established in the treatment of LQT3, its use in other types of LQT need further evaluation. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using systematic electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We assessed QTc reduction and cardiac events after Mexiletine treatment. Inclusion criteria: any study with no language restriction that diagnoses any type of LQTS, uses mexiletine treatment, and provides QTc comparison before and after treatment. Animal studies were excluded. The NIH Study Quality Assessment Tools and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate bias. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and MedCalc software Results: Nine studies (n=281) were included. Mexiletine reduced QTc by -64ms (mean difference [MD], -64.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] -76.13 to -52.30; p<.001; I2 60%). Sensitivity and subanalyses showed consistent efficacy. In five studies (n=76), the number of patient with high-risk QTc (>500ms) significantly decreased (Risk Ratio [RR], 0.38; 95% CI 0.26-0.55; p<.001). Five studies (n=141) showed a significant reduction in cardiac events (RR, 0.25; 95% CI 0.14-0.44; p<.001). Two studies reported gastrointestinal (GI) problems and vertigo as side effects of mexiletine treatment. Conclusion: Mexiletine significantly reduces QTc and cardiac events in LQT2, LQT3, and aLQT patients. Mexiletine also significantly reduces the number of Long QT patients with high-risk QTc Funding: No external funding was received for this study Registration: CRD420250652574