Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST)
Ony Frengky Rumihin
Department of Civil Engineering Master Program, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Priorities for Road Infrastructure Maintenance in a Case Study of Kepanjen Regency Roads Using SWOT Analysis and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) I Ketut Nagageni; Ony Frengky Rumihin; Iswandaru Widyatmoko
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v5i6.89

Abstract

Road pavement damage due to traffic loads can manifest in various forms, such as alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, potholes, rutting, and surface peeling. Therefore, prioritization is necessary for each road section within a single road maintenance program and activity. Addressing this challenge requires a comprehensive analytical approach to prioritize road infrastructure maintenance and improvement. The purpose of this study is to generate priority recommendations based on the analysis to support decision-making. The analysis found that the Blitar Regency-Kepanjen Highway Section is the first priority, followed by the Kepanjen-Gondanglegi Highway Section as the second priority, followed by the Wlingi City-Malang Regency Highway Section, and the Gondanglegi-Turen Highway Section as the last priority. It is also recommended that adjustments be made to the road maintenance priority criteria variables if this decision model is to be applied outside the Kepanjen Regency area and to deepen the comparative study regarding the reliability of the decision support system or software used in mapping the order of road preservation urgency
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and SWOT Analysis of Road Infrastructure Maintenance Priorities (Case Study of Roads in Kepanjen Regency) I Ketut Nagageni; Ony Frengky Rumihin; Iswandaru Widyatmoko
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v5i6.87

Abstract

Road pavement damage due to traffic loads can manifest in various forms, such as alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, potholes, rutting, and surface peeling. Addressing this challenge requires a comprehensive analytical approach to prioritizing road infrastructure maintenance and improvement. The purpose of this study was to determine the priority criteria for determining road infrastructure maintenance in Kepanjen Regency. Data analysis was conducted in two main stages: road condition analysis and the application of the AHP and SWOT methods. Five criteria were used to prioritize road maintenance in Karanganyar Regency: road condition, maintenance costs, average daily traffic, and a SWOT analysis. The SWOT analysis was divided into four sub-criteria: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The road condition criterion was the most influential criterion in determining road maintenance priorities in Kepanjen Regency. The next criteria are maintenance costs, average daily traffic volume, and a SWOT analysis. It is also recommended that adjustments be made to the road maintenance priority criteria if this decision model is to be implemented outside of Kepanjen Regency
Road Handling Priority Analysis Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for East Java Provincial Road Sections in Gresik Regency Based on the PKRMS (Provincial/District Road Management System) Fajar Ilman Tama; Ony Frengky Rumihin; Iswandaru Widyatmoko
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v5i6.86

Abstract

The objective is to analyze the results of provincial road management priorities in Gresik Regency based on the PKRMS application, a government-developed road management system. This aims to obtain an objective picture of the condition of the provincial road network and to compare and integrate the prioritization results between PKRMS and AHP. The results of road maintenance prioritization using the PKRMS application show that the technical priority for road maintenance differs from the cost requirement. Based on the TPI value, section 112 Petiyin–Karangcangkring is the first priority with a value of 83.7, followed by section 110 Surabaya City–Driyorejo–Legundi with a value of 76.2, and section 111 Legundi–Mojokerto Regency with a value of 24.5. However, based on maintenance work (MW), section 110 has the largest cost requirement, making it the section with the highest financing burden. Recommendations: Prioritization should be based not only on the cost of the work but also on the TPI value, AHP criteria weighting, road conditions, traffic volume, connectivity function, and the role of the road section in industrial and logistics areas
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Road Handling Priority Analysis for East Java Provincial Road Sections in Gresik Regency Drawing from the Provincial/District Road Management System (PKRMS) Fajar Ilman Tama; Ony Frengky Rumihin; Iswandaru Widyatmoko
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v5i6.85

Abstract

The AHP method used in this study was used. The AHP questionnaire instrument in this study was structured as a table of pairwise comparisons between criteria. Each criterion was compared with the others using a scale of 1 to 9. The PKRMS results without AHP integration indicate that section 112 is the first priority with a TPI of 83.7. Section 110 is the second priority with a TPI of 76.2. Section 111 is the third priority with a TPI of 24.5. Based on the MW value, section 110 has the highest cost requirement, at IDR 77,415.4 million. However, using the TPI as the basis for technical prioritization, section 112 remains the top priority. After the PKRMS-AHP integration, the technical priority order remains with section 112 as the first priority with a TPI of 24.9, followed by section 110 with a value of 22.5, and section 111 with a value of 7.5. However, in terms of five-year cost requirements, section 110 remains the section with the largest MW value, amounting to Rp57,742.9 million, followed by section 111 at Rp22,200.3 million, and section 112 at Rp9,005.9 million. As for the recommendations, determining priorities should not only be based on the amount of work costs required, but also pay attention to the TPI value, AHP criteria weight, road conditions, traffic volume, connectivity function, and the role of the road section in industrial and logistics areas
Co-Authors Fajar Ilman Tama I Ketut Nagageni Iswandaru Widyatmoko