Fajar Ilman Tama
Civil Engineering Master's Study Program, Faculty of Engineering Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Road Handling Priority Analysis Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for East Java Provincial Road Sections in Gresik Regency Based on the PKRMS (Provincial/District Road Management System) Fajar Ilman Tama; Ony Frengky Rumihin; Iswandaru Widyatmoko
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v5i6.86

Abstract

The objective is to analyze the results of provincial road management priorities in Gresik Regency based on the PKRMS application, a government-developed road management system. This aims to obtain an objective picture of the condition of the provincial road network and to compare and integrate the prioritization results between PKRMS and AHP. The results of road maintenance prioritization using the PKRMS application show that the technical priority for road maintenance differs from the cost requirement. Based on the TPI value, section 112 Petiyin–Karangcangkring is the first priority with a value of 83.7, followed by section 110 Surabaya City–Driyorejo–Legundi with a value of 76.2, and section 111 Legundi–Mojokerto Regency with a value of 24.5. However, based on maintenance work (MW), section 110 has the largest cost requirement, making it the section with the highest financing burden. Recommendations: Prioritization should be based not only on the cost of the work but also on the TPI value, AHP criteria weighting, road conditions, traffic volume, connectivity function, and the role of the road section in industrial and logistics areas
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Road Handling Priority Analysis for East Java Provincial Road Sections in Gresik Regency Drawing from the Provincial/District Road Management System (PKRMS) Fajar Ilman Tama; Ony Frengky Rumihin; Iswandaru Widyatmoko
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v5i6.85

Abstract

The AHP method used in this study was used. The AHP questionnaire instrument in this study was structured as a table of pairwise comparisons between criteria. Each criterion was compared with the others using a scale of 1 to 9. The PKRMS results without AHP integration indicate that section 112 is the first priority with a TPI of 83.7. Section 110 is the second priority with a TPI of 76.2. Section 111 is the third priority with a TPI of 24.5. Based on the MW value, section 110 has the highest cost requirement, at IDR 77,415.4 million. However, using the TPI as the basis for technical prioritization, section 112 remains the top priority. After the PKRMS-AHP integration, the technical priority order remains with section 112 as the first priority with a TPI of 24.9, followed by section 110 with a value of 22.5, and section 111 with a value of 7.5. However, in terms of five-year cost requirements, section 110 remains the section with the largest MW value, amounting to Rp57,742.9 million, followed by section 111 at Rp22,200.3 million, and section 112 at Rp9,005.9 million. As for the recommendations, determining priorities should not only be based on the amount of work costs required, but also pay attention to the TPI value, AHP criteria weight, road conditions, traffic volume, connectivity function, and the role of the road section in industrial and logistics areas