Ferry Rendra P.P. Sitorus
Universitas Cenderawasih

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Penguatan Kapasitas Pengurus PAPEDA melalui Bimbingan Teknis Pendampingan Komunitas Adat Terpencil Berbasis Partisipasi dan Budaya Lokal Avelinus Lefaan; Urip Wahyudin; Ferry Rendra P.P. Sitorus
Kreasi: Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Oktober
Publisher : BALE LITERASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kreasi.v6i3.4862

Abstract

Remote Indigenous Communities (KAT) in Papua face limited access to basic services and economic opportunities, requiring empowerment approaches responsive to local sociocultural conditions. This community service program aimed to strengthen the readiness of the Jayapura Branch of the Papua Penuh Damai Foundation (PAPEDA) to facilitate participatory, culturally responsive assistance. The core technical guidance program lasted two days and was embedded in a broader sequence of needs assessment, training, practical exercises, evaluation, and follow-up planning. Activities combined interactive lectures, group discussions, Papua-based case studies, simulations, and document preparation. Information was collected through observation, brief interviews, and documentation of group outputs and analyzed descriptively. The needs assessment identified six priorities: limited access and quality of life, insufficiently contextualized interventions, underused social capital, limited facilitator capacity, weak planning and evaluation, and inadequate integration of local culture. In response, participants practiced social mapping, participatory facilitation, needs-based planning, and the development of evaluation indicators. The program produced draft social maps, action plans, policy briefs, and evaluation instruments intended to support organizational follow-up. These outputs demonstrate the practical relevance of linking facilitator learning to organizational tools, rather than relying solely on lectures. However, the absence of detailed pre- and post-test scores and longitudinal field evidence prevents quantitative claims about capacity gains or community-level impacts. The program offers an initial framework for rights-based, participatory, and culturally grounded assistance, subject to further field validation.