Mega Puspita Sari
University of Mataram

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Validity of a VARK-Based Mathematics E-Module for Differentiated Learning in Elementary Schools Baiq Yuni Wahyuningsih; Hikmah Ramdhani Putri; Vivi Rachmatul Hidayati; Mega Puspita Sari; Anggi Amalia Fannisa; Monica Tiara Dewi
Bima Journal of Elementary Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Bima Journal of Elementary Education
Publisher : STKIP Taman Siswa Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37630/bijee.v4i2.5060

Abstract

Mathematics learning in elementary schools continues to face challenges due to the limited availability of digital modules that accommodate students' diverse learning styles in differentiated instruction. This study aimed to develop and examine the validity of a VARK (Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic)-based digital mathematics learning module to support differentiated learning in elementary schools. The study employed a modified Research and Development (R&D) method up to the stages of product development and expert validation. Data were collected through a literature review, classroom observations, discussions with teachers and students, and expert validation. The research instruments included observation guidelines, interview guidelines, and expert validation sheets covering module structure, content organization, language, visual design, alignment with the VARK learning styles, and digitalization aspects. Data were analyzed qualitatively using descriptive analysis of the validators' feedback and quantitatively using Aiken's V validity coefficient. The findings indicated that the VARK-based digital mathematics learning module demonstrated a high level of validity, withAiken's V coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 1.00 across all evaluation aspects. The digitalization aspect obtained the highest validity score (0.97), followed by visual design (0.95), module structure and VARK alignment (0.93), content organization (0.91), and language (0.88). These findings indicate that the developed module meets the feasibility criteria and is suitable for use as a learning resource to support differentiated mathematics instruction in elementary schools.
Scientific Literacy Assessment for Future Elementary Teachers: Instrument Development and Validation Fitri Puji Astria; Hasnawati Hasnawati; Ni Made Yeni Suranti; Mega Puspita Sari; Suci Ramadani
Bima Journal of Elementary Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Bima Journal of Elementary Education
Publisher : STKIP Taman Siswa Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37630/bijee.v4i2.5110

Abstract

Scientific literacy is an essential competency that pre-service elementary school (SD) teachers must master in order to foster their future students’ scientific literacy, yet assessment instruments designed specifically for this population remain scarce. This study aimed to develop a scientific literacy-oriented assessment instrument for pre-service SD teachers and to establish its content validity. Using the 4D model, the define, design, and develop stages were carried out, while developmental testing and dissemination were planned as subsequent stages. The instrument integrates three scientific competencies adapted from the PISA framework explaining phenomena scientifically; designing and evaluating scientific inquiry and interpreting data and evidence; and using scientific information for evidence-based decision-making into seven elementary science topics: the respiratory, digestive, and circulatory systems, electricity, the water cycle, the solar system, and biotechnology. The resulting instrument consists of eight contextual stimuli and 20 items (6 multiple-choice and 14 open-ended items).Five Science Education lecturers evaluated the content, construction, and language of each item, and content validity was analyzed using Aiken’s V. All items obtained V values between 0.82 and 0.92 (overall mean = 0.86), placing them in the high validity category, with comparable means for the three competencies. The items with the lowest values were higher-order items requiring inquiry evaluation or decision-making, indicating where refinement should be prioritized. The instrument is therefore content-valid and ready for field testing to examine its reliability, difficulty, and discrimination with pre-service SD teachers.