Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.756
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) Jurnal Ilmiah Publika IBLAM Law Review Humaniorum Journal Journal of Law Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
myharto, Wiend Sakti
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Law

 1 
Penerapan Hukuman Rehabilitasi Terhadap Pecandu Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 115/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt. Utr) Renata, Agnestalia; Myharto, Wiend Sakti
Postulat Vol 2 No 2 (2024): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v2i2.1665

Abstract

The crime of narcotics offenses is considered an extraordinary crime. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Article 1 point 13, states that a Narcotics Addict is a person who uses or abuses Narcotics and is in a state of dependency on Narcotics, both physically and psychologically. Narcotic rehabilitation is one of the efforts to save addicts from the shackles of narcotics and the dangers that accompany them. There are three stages of narcotic rehabilitation in Indonesia: medical rehabilitation, non-medical rehabilitation, and advanced rehabilitation. The problem formulation in this study is how the rehabilitation punishment for narcotics addicts is applied and how the analysis of the considerations of the Panel of Judges of the North Jakarta District Court in imposing rehabilitation sanctions in decision number 1151/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Utr. The type of research in this legal research proposal is normative legal research, focusing on the applicable legal norms, namely positive legal norms in the form of legislation. The results of the study show that the provisions for rehabilitation for narcotics addicts are stipulated in Articles 54 and 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Meanwhile, the classification of user groups is regulated in the Circular of the Supreme Court No. 4 of 2010 concerning the Placement of Abusers, Victims of Abuse, and Narcotics Addicts in Medical and Social Rehabilitation Institutions. The judge's basis for sentencing the Defendant to undergo treatment and/or care at a medical/social rehabilitation institution refers to the provisions of Article 103 jo Article 127 paragraph 2 jo Article 54 of the Republic of Indonesia Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics jo Circular of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 4 of 2010 dated April 7, 2010, concerning the Placement of Abusers, Victims of Abuse, and Narcotics Addicts into Medical and Social Rehabilitation Institutions, as well as other legal facts revealed in the trial.
Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Gol I Bagi Diri Sendiri (Studi Kasus Perkara No.631/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Jkt.Sel) Sembiring, Berlian Garuda; Myharto, Wiend Sakti
Postulat Vol 3 No 1 (2025): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i1.1860

Abstract

Narcotics are substances or idrugs obtained from plant or non-plants, either through amixing process or naturaaly.This substances is capable of causing depression, as well as changes in consciousnes and loss of ttaste, reducing and eliminating suffering, thus causing attachment.The aim of the research is to find out or get what happenes at the end of the reserch.The research method uses a qualitative normative juridical method through approaching the court decision in Case No.631/Pid.Sus/2023/PNJkt.Sel and statutory regulations.Result obtained from the Agus Taufik Hidayat case carried out at the Southerm District Court which imposed sanctions in the form of detention and fines. This decission was not wise or appropriate because it did not take into account SEMA No:04 of 2010
Co-Authors agus rifai Firmansyah, Rizal Kinarta, Danny Lestari, Riva Noor Lorenza, Miranda Lola Miharja, Marjan Nugraha, Sandi Nugroho, Taufiq Ardi Renata, Agnestalia Rizaldi, Fahim Achmad Rusma, Yasmin Noor Hanan Sembiring, Berlian Garuda Susilo, Giri Syamsiar, Syamsiar