Dewi, Ni Putu Kompiang Ratna
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

IMPLIKASI HUKUM PENETAPAN HAK KOMUNAL TERHADAP TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT ADAT (Tinjauan Yuridis Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penetapan Hak Komunal Atas Ta Ni Putu Kompiang Ratna Dewi
Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Mei 2017
Publisher : Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Ni Putu Kompiang Ratna Dewi, Dr. Imam Koeswahyono, SH., MH., M. Hamidi Masykur, SH. M.Kn. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Email: kompiangrd@gmail.com   ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertolak dari lahirnya Permen ATR/KBPN No. 10/2016 yang mempersamakan masyarakat Adat dengan masyarakat yang berada dalam Kawasan Tertentu sebagai subjek hak komunal. Masyarakat Adat dan Masyarakat yang berada dalam Kawasan Tertentu sesungguhnya memiliki karakteristik yang sangat berbeda. Mempersamakan keduanya telah mengaburkan keberadaan hak ulayat sebagai hak pengelolaan, kepemilikan serta penguasaan tanah oleh Masyarakat Adat. Kaburnya hak pengelolaan, kepemilikan serta penguasaan tanah oleh Masyarakat Adat karena Permen ATR/KBPN No. 10/2016 tentu menimbulkan implikasi hukum. Implikasi Hukum Penetapan Hak Komunal Berdasarkan Permen ATR/KBPN No. 10/2016 Terhadap Masyarakat Adat atas Tanah Ulayatnya adalah: (a) Tidak jelasnya eksistensi hak ulayat dalam tatanan hukum Indonesia; (b) Tidak pastinya kedudukan hukum hak penguasaan, kepemilikan serta penguasaan tanah masyarakat adat. (c) Hak ulayat masyarakat adat yang dibingkai dalam bentuk hak komunal merupakan bentuk penyederhanaan terhadap hak ulayat. (d) Timbulnya potensi adanya tumpang tindih antara masyarakat Adat dengan masyarakat dalam Kawasan Tertentu pada satu objek yang sama. Untuk itu perlulah dibentuk suatu Undang-Undang Masyarakat Adat. Kata Kunci: Hak Ulayat, Hak Komunal, Masyarakat adat, Masyarakat yang berada dalam Kawasan tertentu, implikasi hukum   ABSTRACT This research is based on the released of Ministry Regulation of ATR / KBPN. 10/2016 which likens Indigenous peoples to communities within the Specific Area as subject of communal rights. Indigenous Peoples and Communities within Specific Areas basically have very different characteristics. Equalizing both has obscured the existence of ulayat rights as rights of management, ownership and control of land by indigenous peoples. Blurred rights of management, ownership and control of land by the public due to the presence of Ministry Regulation of ATR / KBPN No. 10/2016 certainly raises the legal implications. Legal Implication of the Establishment of Communal Rights Based on Ministry Regulation of ATR / KBPN 10/2016 Against Indigenous Peoples on their Ulayat Land are: (a) Unclear fate of customary rights in the legal order of Indonesia; (b) Uncertain legal status of tenure, ownership and control of customary land. (c) Customary rights of indigenous peoples that framed in the form of communal rights constitute a form of simplification of customary rights. (d) The emergence of potential overlap between Indigenous peoples and communities in Certain Regions on the same object. Therefore it is necessary to establish an Indigenous Peoples Act that specifically regulates Indigenous peoples as the foothold of any legislation regulating Indigenous peoples. Keywords: Ulayat Rights, Communal Rights, Indigenous Peoples, Communities within Specific Areas, Legal implications
KEWENANGAN LPD DALAM PENGAMBILALIHAN AYDA MELALUI HAK TANGGUNGAN Ratna Dewi, NI Putu Kompiang; Eka Krisna Yanti, Anak Agung Istri
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 9 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i09.p25

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan memahami pengaturan pelaksanaan AYDA oleh LPD sebagai upaya mengatasi kredit macet dan menganalisis kedudukan hukum LPD dalam pelaksanaan AYDA terhadap agunan berupa hak tanggungan. Guna mencapai tujuan penelitian tersebut, penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitianhukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Berdasarkan analisis yang dilakukan didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa ketentuan tentang pelaksanaan AYDA yang dilakukan oleh LPD diatur melalui Pasal 17 Pergub Bali No. 44/2017. Berdasarkan ketentuan tersebut LPD dapat melakukan AYDA untuk menyelesaiakn peroalan kredit macet. Namum LPD memiliki kewajiban untuk melakukan penyelesaian terhadap agunan tersebut dalam jangka waktu 6 (enam) bulan, jika melebihi jangka waktu tersebut LPD tidak bisa melakukan penyelesaian terhadap agunan yang diambil alih maka LPD berkewajiban menanggung segala biaya yang timbul terhadap agunan tersebut. Ketentuan lain tentang kebijakan dan prosedur pelaksanaan AYDA oleh LPD ditaur lebih lanjut melalui Paruman Desa dan kemudian disetujui oleh Panureska. Kewenangan dan kedudukan hukum LPD dalam melakukan AYDA didasari atas ketentuan Pasal 17 ayat 1 Pergub Bali No. 44/2017. Namun, agar LPD tetap bisa memperoleh legitimasi dan perlindungan hukum atas pelaksanaan AYDA ang dilakukannya terhadap objek Hak Tanggungan bilamana terjadi sengketa, maka penyusunan kebijakan dan prosedur pelaksanaan AYDA yang berkaitan dengan hak tanggungan haruslah mempertimbangkan prinsip-prinsip dan ketentuan hukum positif yang berlaku. ABSTRACT This research was conducted to understand the arrangements for implementing AYDA by LPDs as an effort to overcome bad credit and analyze the legal position of LPDs in implementing AYDA regarding collateral in the form of mortgage rights. To achieve the research objectives, this research was carried out using a normative legal research method with a statute approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis, it was concluded that the provisions regarding the implementation of AYDA carried out by the LPD are regulated through Article 17 of Bali Gubernatorial Regulation No. 44/2017. Based on these provisions, LPD can carry out AYDA to resolve bad credit problems. However, the LPD has an obligation to settle the collateral within a period of 6 (six) months, if beyond this period the LPD cannot settle the repossessed collateral, the LPD is obliged to bear all costs arising from the collateral. Other provisions regarding policies and procedures for implementing AYDA by the LPD are further regulated through Paruman Desa and then approved by Panureksa. The authority and legal position of the LPD in carrying out AYDA is based on the provisions of Article 17 paragraph 1 of Bali Gubernatorial Regulation No. 44/2017. However, so that the LPD can still obtain legitimacy and legal protection for the implementation of AYDA carried out on Mortgage Rights objects in the event of a dispute, the preparation of policies and procedures for implementing AYDA relating to mortgage rights must take into account the applicable positive legal principles and provisions.
ANALISIS PERKEMBANGAN PARADIGMA CYBER NOTARY: SINTESIS ATAS PROBLEMATIKA PENGATURAN CYBER NOTARY DI INDONESIA Ratna Dewi, Ni Putu Kompiang; Anak Agung Ayu Intan Puspadewi
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Repertorium: November 2025
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v14i2.5115

Abstract

This article aims to understand and analyze the development of the cyber notary paradigm in order to achieve a synthesis of the dialectical problems of cyber notary regulation in Indonesia. This scientific article is normative legal research that uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research shows that the bias in understanding cyber notaries paradigm in Indonesia which emphasizes modernization of the implementation of notary authority has resulted in the regulation regarding cyber notaries to this day still standing in place. So, it is necessary to separate the concept of the cyber notary as a way to provide legal certainty and protection in electronic transactions by modernizing the implementation of notary authority by utilizing technology. The modernization of the implementation of the notary's authority should be studied carefully so as not to deny the basic principles of the implementation of the notary's authority. While the implementation of the cyber notary as providing legal certainty and protection in electronic transactions should focus on reviewing and regulating the types of electronic transactions, the relevance of the notary's office area, notary legal instruments/products, the strength of evidence and dispute settlement procedures as well as the special expertise that a notary must have to support the implementation of cyber notaries.