Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Jurnal Akta International Journal of Social Service and Research Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Honeste Vivere
Situmeang, Tomson
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Effectiveness of Merging Compensation Claims in Criminal Cases: A Case Study of Decision Number 196/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Jkt.Utr. Lengkong, Lonna Yohanes; Situmeang, Tomson; Washington, Andree
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 03 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR)
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.743

Abstract

This study investigates the Efficiency of Combining Compensation Claims in Criminal Cases, focusing on Decision Number 196/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. Jkt.Utr. Crime victims' rights are addressed by Law Number 8 of 1981, specifically in Articles 98 to 101 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP), while compensation in Civil Law is governed by Article 1365 of the Civil Code. However, seeking compensation through civil law procedures can be time-consuming. A normative juridical approach was employed, utilizing statutory analysis and a case study method. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials provided secondary data. The analysis, framed by justice theory and legal certainty theory, reveals that merging compensation lawsuits with criminal cases under Article 98 of the Criminal Procedure Code can expedite resolution. Prerequisites for consolidation include alignment of defendant actions with charges, resulting losses, and a request from the aggrieved party to the Judge. This study underscores the potential of combining cases to streamline compensation claims, offering implications for enhancing victims' access to justice within the legal system.
PENERAPAN ASPEK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PERJANJIAN LISENSI DAN WARALABA PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 394/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel. Situmeang, Tomson; Jayadi, Hendri; Setiawan, Liana
Honeste Vivere Vol 34 No 1 (2024): January
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v34i1.310

Abstract

In business, agreements are the basis for running a business. However, it is not uncommon for agreements to experience problems, where one of the parties commits a breach of contract or acts against the law. In Indonesia, foreign business actors often have doubts about investing or collaborating with Indonesian companies, because there is no guarantee of legal certainty. Among them, a business agreement dispute between Harvey Nichols and Company Limited and PT Hamparan Nusantara and PT Mitra Adiperkasa, Tbk. The business agreement begins with the signing of an Exclusive License Agreement. This problem is quite interesting and complex, where apart from the International Arbitration decision, there is also the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 394/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel. which are contradictory to each other which gives rise to legal uncertainty. This article was written to discuss this matter, namely regarding the Application of Legal Certainty Aspects in License Agreements and Franchise Agreements in Decision Number 394/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel. In this paper, a normative juridical research method is used with a statutory approach and a case approach. The theory of legal certainty is used to analyze existing problems. The analysis concludes that the Exclusive License Agreement is not the same as a Franchise Agreement or a License Agreement for Intellectual Property Rights. This Exclusive Permit Agreement has its own specifics as an Unnamed Agreement (innominaat). This agreement is a form of innovation and implementation of current developments in economic and business practices in the world. The agreement is subject to the provisions of Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, Article 1319 of the Civil Code, and Article 1320 of the Civil Code which regulate the conditions for the validity of an agreement, namely: the agreement of those who bind themselves, their ability to make an agreement; a certain thing, and a lawful cause.
Music Copyright Protection in the Digital Era: Legal Framework and Strategies for Enforcement Panjaitan, Hulman; Betlehn, Andrew; Situmeang, Tomson; Khan, Md Zubair Kasem; Miraz, Mahadi Hasan
Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jh.40.2.235-257

Abstract

This research investigates the factors contributing to global music copyright infringement in the digital era, the legal framework established by Indonesian Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, and strategies for strengthening protection. Using a doctrinal legal research approach, the study incorporates statutory and comparative legal analyses to assess the effectiveness of Indonesia’s copyright laws and proposed strategies. The findings indicate that digital piracy globally is primarily driven by technological advances, the ease of sharing pirated content, and inconsistent international copyright laws. These issues have resulted in significant financial losses for creators and the rise of new forms of piracy. In Indonesia, while Law Number 28 of 2014 provides robust protections for creators, including economic and moral rights, enforcement remains problematic due to low public awareness and the rapid pace of technological advancements. Key institutions, such as the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual/DJKI) and Collective Management Institutions (Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional/LMKN), play a critical role in enforcement but need further support. The study recommends strengthening legal frameworks, international harmonization, and leveraging technological solutions such as blockchain to improve copyright enforcement in Indonesia and ensure fair compensation for artists.
KONTEKSTUALISASI KONSEP PEMBELAAN TERPAKSA (NOODWEER EXCES) DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN Lengkong, Lonna Yohanes; Situmeang, Tomson; Sianipar, Christine Nataniar
Honeste Vivere Vol 35 No 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v35i1.386

Abstract

In the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), there is a concept known as a criminal elimination reason, which allows a person who commits an act that would normally be considered a crime to go unpunished. One such reason is the concept of forgiveness, which eliminates the perpetrator's guilt. This means that even though their actions are proven to violate the law, the perpetrator is not punished due to the elimination of their guilt. An example of such a concept is Forced Defense that exceeds the limit (noodweer excesses). This study focuses on the regulation of excessive forced defense (noodweer exces) according to criminal law in Indonesia, as well as the application of this concept in a specific court decision. The research method used is normative legal research, with a case approach, using various legal materials such as legislation, decisions, expert opinions, legal dictionaries, law journals, and encyclopedias. The study's findings indicate that the defendant has fulfilled all the elements of excessive forced defense (noodweer exces) as regulated in Article 49, Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. It was found that the defendant did not intentionally stab the victim with a knife due to being in a state of great shock at the time
The Government Procurement Contract (A Juridical Review between Civil Code VS Presidential Regulation) Situmeang, Tomson
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i3.46792

Abstract

There are two types of provisions that govern agreements, namely private law and public law. PBJP is a government activity that is realized through a contract, but the contract is unique because it is hybrid, it is a private contract but is subject to the provisions of public law. This research aims to conduct a critical review of the differences or inconsistencies between the rules regarding Government Procurement of Goods/Services (PBJP) contained in Presidential Regulation Number 46 of 2025 and the fundamental principles of agreement law contained in the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). The theoretical foundation of this research rests on the theory of legal certainty and Hans Kelsen's and Nawiasky's theory of tiered legal norms (Stufenbau Theorie). Methodologically, it adopts a normative juridical approach, specifically through statutory and conceptual analyses. The results showed that the regulation of PBJP through the Perpres normatively contradicts the principle of hierarchy of legal norms because the Civil Code as lex generalis is a product of law that is higher than the Perpres. Ironically, the Perpres plays a dominant role in the practice of implementation and dispute resolution of the PBJP contract, including when there is a wrong interpretation that makes default a corruption crime. The main finding of this article is the importance of adjusting the regulation of PBJP with the principles of civil law and hierarchy of norms, as well as the need for the establishment of a separate law that comprehensively regulates PBJP. Thus, the legal regulation of PBJP must be placed in the national legal system consistently in order to create legal certainty and prevent overlapping between public and private norms.
ASEAN ATTITUDES TOWARD PATENT PROTECTION OF THE COVID-19 VACCINE VERSUS HUMANITARIAN INTERESTS Situmeang, Tomson; Murniarti, Erni
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.255-276

Abstract

The global pandemic of the Covid-19 outbreak has caused problems in various aspects of life. Several countries have invented or made the Covid-19 vaccine. However, there are still many countries that have not been able to find or make the Covid-19 vaccine, including ASEAN countries. This raises questions that are the topic of discussion in this article, namely about ASEAN's attitude towards 2 different interests between patent protection for the Covid-19 vaccine and humanitarian interests in overcoming the Covid-19 outbreak. Does Patent protection take priority or humanitarian interest take precedence? To discuss this topic, the authors use normative legal research methods based on secondary data or bibliography. The topic was discussed by comparing various legal provisions, both national and international, in order to obtain the main findings stating that patent protection also prioritizes humanitarian interests
Makna delik penodaan agama dalam pasal 156a KUHP dan undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang KUHP Lengkong, Lonna Yohanes; Situmeang, Tomson
JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 9 No. 4 (2023): JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia)
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Theraphy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/020232682

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui makna delik penodaan agama dalam pasal 156A KUHP dan Undang-Undang nomor 1 tahun 2023 tentang KUHP.Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis-normatif. Objek penelitian adalah pasal 156A KUHP dan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP. Metode pengolahan dan penyajian menggunakan bahan hukum primer melalui pengkajian sumber-sumber yang sudah terdokumentasikan dalam bentuk bahan- bahan hukum. Metode analisis penelitian kualitatif yaitu dengan memberikan analisis pada bahan-bahan hukum yang telah tersedia. Hasil dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa penerapan ketentuan Pasal 156a KUHP dalam perkara-perkara Penistaan Agama telah keluar dari jalur makna yang sesungguhnya. Hal ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Dengan terbitnya UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP, yang baru diberlakukan pada 2036 mendatang, maka pemaknaan norma hukum pidana terkait tindak pidana agama atau kepercayaan harus dilakukan secara hati-hati dan sangat dibutuhkan penjelasan ahli hukum pidana secara kasuistis.
Co-Authors Betlehn, Andrew Erni Murniarti, Erni Hulman Panjaitan, Hulman Jayadi, Hendri Khan, Md Zubair Kasem Lengkong, Lonna Yohanes Miraz, Mahadi Hasan Setiawan, Liana Sianipar, Christine Nataniar Washington, Andree