Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Scientia Law Review
Herry Christian, Jordy
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Studi Yuridis Onrechtmatigedaad Sebagai Faktor Untuk Lelang Pembatalan Dalam Obyek Agunan Herry Christian, Jordy
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Perkembangan Hukum di Era Disrupsi
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (600.864 KB) | DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v3i2.35401

Abstract

Studi yuridis dari tindakan melanggar hukum (onrechtmatige daad) sebagai faktor dalam membatalkan lelang benda tinjauan hipotek apakah ada perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh kreditur terhadap debitur dalam pelaksanaan lelang untuk pelaksanaan obyek hipotek yang tepat . Penelitian ini tidak terlepas dari artikel 1365 KUHPerdata Indonesia yang berisi 4 elemen dari tindakan melanggar hukum, yaitu adanya tindakan yang melawan hukum, adanya kesalahan, keberadaan kerugian dan adanya hubungan sebab akibat. Salah satu argumen modern yang sering digunakan oleh debitur untuk membatalkan lelang benda hipotek adalah untuk menetapkan nilai batas rendah pada lelang yang melawan hukum. Kita bisa melihat contoh ini di Mahkamah Agung Keputusan No. 274 / PDT.G / 2013 / PN.
The Deprivation of Women's Rights Due to Discrimination on the Marriage Age Limit Herry Christian, Jordy; Edenela, Kirana
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Quo Vadis Protection of Women in Indonesia: Law Enforcement Practices and Theorie
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v3i1.30723

Abstract

In the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in article 27 paragraph (1) it is said that every citizen has the same position in law and government, but the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 which stipulates a difference in the minimum age limit for marriage, namely 16 (sixteen) years for women and 19 (nineteen) years for men, which creates discrimination against women and hinders the fulfillment of women's constitutional rights, namely the right to health, education and equality before the law. In its decision Number 22/PUU-XV/2017 asked the DPR to immediately revise the minimum age limit for marriage, but the Constitutional Court did not clearly stipulate the minimum age limit for marriage due to its open legal policy. Based on normative juridical studies, it can be concluded that the ideal minimum age for marriage is 18 years because it is in accordance with positive law in Indonesia and in accordance with global demands and eliminates discriminatory nature in the Marriage Law.
Juridical Study of Unlawful Acts as Factors in Cancellation of Auctions on Guaranteed Objects Herry Christian, Jordy
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Development of Law in the Era of Disruption
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lesrev.v3i2.35401

Abstract

The juridical study of onrechtmatige daad as a factor in the cancellation of the auction of mortgage objects guarantees whether there is PMH (onrechtmatige daad) carried out by the creditor against the debtor in carrying out the execution auction of the mortgage object execution. This study is inseparable from article 1365 Burgerlijk Wetboek which was ratified into the Civil Code which contains 4 conditions or elements of onrechtmatige daad, namely that there must be an act (daad), an error (schuld), a loss (shade) and causality (causality). One of the modern arguments often used by debtors to cancel auctions of mortgage objects is the setting of a low value or price limit that is not in accordance with the provisions of the auction. As a real example of setting a limit value or price as a cancelation factor for an auction, we can find it in the Supreme Court Decision No. 274/PDT.G/2013/PN.BDG in which the debtor argues that there was an unlawful act committed by the creditor or the defendant so that the judge declares the auction is illegal and has no binding legal force, this is because the implementation of the auction does not comply with the auction provisions in PMK Number 27/PMK.06/2016, so that the minutes of the auction for the collateral object are canceled by the judge in his decision.
Co-Authors Edenela, Kirana