Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Substantive Justice International Journal of Law DE'RECHTSSTAAT Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Notaire
Tanbun, Elma Putri
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum atas Dua Putusan Pernyataan Pailit terhadap Debitor yang Sama Jayaningrat, I Gusti Ngurah Anantha Wikrama; Tanbun, Elma Putri; Komaria, Lailatul; Arthadi, Gerry
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i3.57587

Abstract

AbstractBankruptcy declaration decisions against the debtor results in the debtor by law has no right to control and manage his assets. The debtor’s assets shall then be managed by the receiver under the supervision of the supervisory judge who is appointed based on the bankruptcy declaration decisions. If there are two bankruptcy declaration decisions against the same debtor, it will create legal uncertainty in terms of the management and settlement of bankruptcy assets. There is a legal vacuum regarding the regulation of two bankruptcy declaration decisions against the same debtor. Based on this, the legal issue in this writing is an analysis of the applicability of two bankruptcy declaration decisions against the same debtor and the merger of bankruptcy estate settlement from two bankruptcy declaration decisions against the same debtor. The research in this writing is legal research using statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The research concludes that for two bankruptcy declaration decisions against the same debtor, the two bankruptcy declaration decisions are equally valid as the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur and it is possible to issue a stipulation of merging the processes of settlement of the debtor’s bankruptcy assets into one as the interpretation of the provisions of Article 91 UUKPKPU to guarantee legal certainty.Keywords: Debtor; Bankruptcy; Settlement; Decision. AbstrakPutusan pernyataan pailit terhadap debitor menyebabkan debitor demi hukumkehilangan hak dalam menguasai dan mengurus harta kekayaannya. Harta kekayaan debitor selanjutnya dilakukan pengurusan dan pemberesan oleh kurator dengan pengawasan hakim pengawas yang ditunjuk dan diangkat berdasarkan putusan pernyataan pailit. Apabila terdapat dua putusan pernyataan pailit terhadap debitor yang sama maka akan menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam hal pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit. Terdapat kekosongan hukum dalam hal terhadap debitor yang sama terdapat dua putusan pernyataan pailit. Berdasarkan hal tersebut isu hukum dalam penulisan ini adalah analisis keberlakuan dua putusan pernyataan pailit terhadap debitor yang sama serta penggabungan pemberesan harta kekayaan debitor dari dua putusan pernyataan pailit terhadap debitor yang sama. Penulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum (legal research) dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Kesimpulan dari penulisan ini adalah terhadap dua putusan pernyataan pailit terhadap satu debitor yang sama maka kedua putusan pernyataan pailit tersebut sama-sama berlaku sebagaimana prinsip res judicata pro veritate habetur serta dapat dikeluarkannya penetapan penggabungan proses pemberesan harta pailit debitor menjadi satu sebagaimana penafsiran terhadap ketentuan Pasal 91 UUKPKPU guna menjamin suatu kepastian hukum.Kata Kunci: Debitor; Pailit, Pemberesan; Putusan.
Reformulation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Public Information Requests to Achieve Constructive Law Enforcement and Legal Certainty Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah; Nugraha, Xavier; Tanbun, Elma Putri
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 4 No 1 (2021): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i1.122

Abstract

The nature of law enforcement in resolving multi-dimensional information disputes has a logical consequence on the need for constructive law enforcement. This research aims to examine the forms of law enforcement that exist in resolving disputes over requests for public information and to formulate a constructive mechanism to realize a series of law enforcement procedures with legal certainty. This research is normative legal research using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results showed that law enforcement in the settlement of public information disputes consists of the objection, non-litigation adjudication, and litigation covering civil, state administration, and criminal law. In this case, The Criminal law instruments are placed as the final law enforcement if the relevant public agency does not carry out a decision that has permanent legal force. In addition, in the context of realizing comprehensive and constructive law enforcement, a Memorandum of Understanding was held between the Information Commission and the Police to synergize and effectively implement the criminal law as a final resort.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEWENANGAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILU (DKPP) DALAM MENCIPTAKAN PEMILU YANG DEMOKRATIS DI INDONESIA Aldi, Jihan Anjania; Tanbun, Elma Putri; Nugraha, Xavier
DE'RECHTSSTAAT Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): JURNAL HUKUM DE'RECHTSSTAAT
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Djuanda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (777 KB) | DOI: 10.30997/jhd.v5i2.1941

Abstract

Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) merupakan salah satu dari triumvirat penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia. Politik hukum pemilu di Indonesia dalam status a quo memberikan kewenangan yang begitu koersif kepada DKPP terkait dengan penegakkan kode etik. Namun, begitu koersifnya kewenangan yang DKPP sejatinya menimbulkan pertanyaan mendasar, yaitu terkait dengan : 1.Bagaimana korelasi kode etik dengan penyelenggaraan Pemilu yang demokratis di Indonesia?2.Bagaimana korelasi kewenangan DKPP dengan terciptanya Pemilu yang demokratis?Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis yang menggunakan pendekatan statute approach, conceptual approach, dan case approach untuk menjawab problematika tersebut. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, ditemukan bahwa Kode Etik pemilu berkorelasi sebagai perwujudan aturan main yang dibentuk bersama agar terciptanya pemilu yang jujur dan adil agar terciptanya pemilu yang demokratis secara substansial, bukan hanya prosedural. Selain itu, ditemukan bahwa kewenangan DKPP yang koersif adalah untuk menjamin agar Penyelenggara Pemilu mentaati Kode Etik yang merupakan aturan main dalam penyelenggaraan Pemilu.  Ketika DKPP tidak memiliki wewenang yang koersif tersebut, akan membuat DKPP seolah menjadi harimau tanpa taring yang akan menyebabkan terjadinya pemilu yang tidak mencerminkan demokrasi yang substantif
The Paradigm of Termination of Employment Relationship Againts Worker/Labor Suspected in Criminal Action Setiawan, Peter Jeremiah; Nugraha, Xavier; Tanbun, Elma Putri
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.2239

Abstract

After the issuance of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, several policies in Indonesia are amended, including the Manpower Law, especially regarding the termination of employment relationship on worker/labor suspected of committing a criminal action. This research is a normative legal research that uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The result of this research shows that there has been a change of paradigm on the policy of termination of employment relationship against worker/labor suspected of committing a criminal action, which previously was based on the principle of presumption of guilt and became the principle of efficiency of justice. This happened since the policy on the termination of employment relationship based on the principle of presumption of guilt creates several issues, such as the lengthy period to wait for a legally binding decision, employers are unable to get a substitute worker/labor, worker/labor who has not been working in a long period will find difficulties when he returns to work.
Co-Authors Aldi, Jihan Anjania Arthadi, Gerry Jayaningrat, I Gusti Ngurah Anantha Wikrama Komaria, Lailatul Nugraha, Xavier