Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Counseling on Geographical Indications for Solo Batik S, Josef Purwadi; Hamidi, Ayu Kumala Sari
AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol 4, No 1 (2025): January 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v4i1.5018

Abstract

Batik merupakan warisan budaya Indonesia yang memiliki nilai estetika dan fungsional, serta berkontribusi signifikan terhadap perekonomian nasional. Kampung Batik Laweyan di Solo, yang dikenal sebagai salah satu pusat produksi batik tertua di Indonesia, memiliki sekitar 250 motif batik yang terdaftar dan diakui. Namun, masih banyak produk batik dari daerah ini yang belum terdaftar dalam Indikasi Geografis (IG), yang berpotensi menimbulkan penyalahgunaan dan mengaburkan asal-usul produk. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum mengenai pentingnya pendaftaran Indikasi Geografis bagi pengrajin batik di Laweyan, guna meningkatkan kesadaran akan hak atas kekayaan intelektual dan perlindungan produk lokal. Metode yang digunakan dalam pengabdian masyarakat ini meliputi ceramah dan diskusi interaktif, diikuti oleh 20 perwakilan pengrajin batik. Hasil dari kegiatan ini menunjukkan antusiasme tinggi dari peserta dalam memahami dan mendaftarkan produk mereka untuk melindungi ciri khas batik Laweyan. Diharapkan, hasil pengabdian ini dapat memberikan kontribusi bagi pengembangan industri batik dan perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual di Indonesia.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS ATAS MEREK KOPI TORAJA DAN KOPI GAYO YANG DIDAFTARKAN OLEH NEGARA LAIN Hamidi, Ayu Kumala Sari; Faniyah, Iyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ulr.v2i1.60

Abstract

The existence of IPR, especially Geographical Indications and Brands, is the basis of policy making in the world of Trade. Indonesia is a country that is rich in potential Geographical Indication products and then Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Geographical Indications and brands for National Regulations and in TRIPS as International Arrangements. but there are still violations of cases regarding Geographical Indications and Trademarks and occur in Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee. The formulation of the problem in this research is how is the trademark legal law for Geographical Indications in the case of Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee registered by other countries? How is the legal settlement of the Violation of Brand Geographical Indications carried out by other Countries against Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee?The specification of this study is Descriptive Analysis. The approach is a normative juridical approach using secondary data obtained through library studies. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. Based on the results of research and analysis, answers can be obtained: 1) Legal protection against Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee registered by other countries, namely by registering the trademark to the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights and after obtaining a Geographical Indication certificate from the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, the geographical indication of a product's brand it gets strong protection. 2) Legal settlement of brand violations and geographical indications of the brand of Toraja coffee and Gayo coffee are litigation methods carried out through the Commercial Court institution, for Toraja Coffee to be carried out at the Ujung Pandang Commercial Court and Gayo Coffee at the Medan Commercial Court.