Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kedudukan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Penerima Protokol Notaris yang Meninggal Dunia Putra, Eko Permana; Yuliandri, Yuliandri; Fendri, Azmi
Alhurriyah Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2608

Abstract

answer the needs and interests of the community of legal certainty, as stated in the agreements, agreements and agreements made by the parties in the form of authentic deeds. The making of an authentic deed as a perfect proof and no further evidence is needed to strengthen the arguments in a legal case. Authentic deed consists of minuta deed and a copy of the deed. Minutes of deed are kept by a Notary who is part of the Notary protocol which must be kept and maintained by the notary because it is a state archive. Article 1 number 8 of the UUJN states that "Authentic Deed that is kept as a notary protocol is minuta deed, that is, the original deed which includes the signatures of the registrants, witnesses, and Notary that are kept as part of the notary protocol. Notary recipient of other notary protocols obliged to save this deed is not responsible for the contents of the deed of the notary protocol that it receives. The notary is obliged directly to the Notary protocol. The death of a Notary Public, in addition to leaving problems regarding work pending, of course, will also leave other problems related to the Notary protocol. Notary recipient of the Notary protocol is not the deed maker of the Notary protocol submitted to him. The notary recipient of the protocol can provide services to the client or the public by issuing a grosse deed, a copy of the deed and a citation of the deed of minuta deed which is part of the Notary protocol that has been submitted to him.
Problematika TAP MPR dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Peluang Judicial Review ke Mahkamah Konstitusi Trinanda, Desip; Yuliandri, Yuliandri; Fahmi, Khairul
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 19, No 3 (2022): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - September 2022
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v19i3.882

Abstract

 AbstrakDalam perjalanan ketatanegaraan Indonesia lembaga Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR) mengalami transformasi dari lembaga tertinggi negara kepada lembaga tinggi negara. Transformasi tersebut berimplikasi terhadap kewenangan MPR, dimana sebelum Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 (UUD 1945) MPR berwenang mengeluarkan TAP MPR/S sedangkan pasca Amandemen UUD 1945 menjadi tidak berwenang. Setelah diberlakukannya Undang-undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan diubah kembali dengan Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan (UU PPP), TAP MPR/S dimasukkan kembali kedalam hierarki perundang-undangan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 7 huruf b. Hal itu menimbulkan problematika serius dalam konsep negara hukum Indonesia dan sekaligus merugikan hak konstitusional warga negara. Pasalnya tidak ada lembaga negara yang berwenang menguji TAP MPR/S jika ditemukan bertentangan dengan UUD 1945. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa TAP MPR yang masih berlaku sekarang masih mengikat keluar meskipun MPR tidak berwenang lagi mengeluarkan TAP MPR/S. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi yaitu; pertama, TAP MPR/S yang berlaku mesti diubah menjadi undang-undang supaya dapat diuji ke Mahkamah Konstitusi; dan kedua, Mahkamah Konstitusi mesti melakukan penafsiran konstitusi dengan menerima permohoanan judicial review TAP MPR/S terhadap UUD 1945 sepanjang TAP MPR/S yang masih berlaku belum diubah menjadi Undang-undang. 
Reconstruction of Restrictions on the President's Power in Determining the Posture of Ministries in the Indonesian Government System Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad; Yuliandri, Yuliandri; Simabura, Charles; Fahmi, Khairul; Nur, Asrul Ibrahim
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 2 JULY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i2.29684

Abstract

This research is a critique of the 2024 State Ministry Law which gives the President the freedom to form Ministries according to his needs.. Based on this law, the President, Prabowo Subianto, formed a Cabinet consisting of 48 Ministries. For this reason, it is urgent to immediately enact a Presidential Agency Law to limit the President's power in determining the posture of ministries so that their functions do not overlap, do not reflect cabinet affairs, and prevent corruption. Through the Presidential Agency Law, it is hoped that the President will not use Ministerial positions as political barter and "share power" with political parties, coalitions and volunteers in General Elections. This research is normative research with statutory, historical, comparative and conceptual approaches. In this study it was concluded: 1).Cabinet dynamics in Indonesia after the enactment of the 2008 Law on State Ministries, namely, the Indonesia Bersatu; The Kerja Cabinet; and The Indonesia Maju Cabinet has Cabinet members, 34 Ministry; and Merah Putih Cabinet,  The number of Cabinet members is 48 Ministries in accordance with the 2024 State Ministry Law which gives the President the freedom to form Ministries according to his needs. 2).Design a Reconstruction of Restrictions on the President's Power in Determining the Posture of Ministries in the Indonesian Government System, namely: First, Establishing the Presidential Agency Law. Second, the Law on Presidential Agency must regulate the maximum number of 24 Ministries. Third, the amalgamation of Institutions within the President's circle to become an integral part of the Ministry of State Secretary. Fourth, the abolition of the Coordinating Ministry Institution. Fifth, Elimination of the Position of Vice Minister