Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

STRENGTHENING RISK MANAGEMENT OF SHARIA BANKING IN INDONESIA Miftah Idris
Madani Legal Review Vol 3 No 1 (2019): Madani Legal Review
Publisher : FAKULTAS HUKUM UM PAREPARE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (330.846 KB) | DOI: 10.31850/malrev.v3i1.341

Abstract

The risk faced by sharia banking in channeling funds through financing is the biggest source of risk for business operations, because the presence of problematic financing not only lowers income for Islamic banks but also affects the health of Islamic banks. Therefore, risk management is needed to identify, measure, monitor and control risks in accordance with Islamic banking business activities. The purpose of this study is how efforts are made to improve the optimization of risk management in Islamic Banking. The research method used is descriptive legal research or literature with a type of qualitative research. The results of the study found that there is a need for optimization of institutions and systems in strengthening risk management in Islamic banking today
Comparison Of The Pretrial System In Indonesia And The US Haeranah, Haeranah; Achmad Dzulfikar Musakkir; Jims Oktovianus; Miftah Idris
International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 03 (2023): August, International Journal of Education, vocational and Social Science (IJE
Publisher : Cita konsultindo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63922/ijevss.v2i03.290

Abstract

The pretrial system in Indonesia and in America clearly has differences based on the state legal system in each of these countries. In Indonesia, the implementation of pretrial is clearly regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, while in America, which has a decentralized legal system, where the stages are regulated by federal and state laws which may differ in all jurisdictions in America. To find out comprehensively the comparison in the pretrial system that exists in Indonesia and America, so the research method used in this study is normative legal research with a comparative approach. From the research results, it was found that the outline of the comparison of the pretrial system between the two countries, such as the process of arrest and detention, as well as the concepts of bail and pretrial release, showed variations between the two countries. Indonesia uses the temporary release option, while the United States generally uses bail and conditional release mechanisms. Motions and pretrial hearings in Indonesia involve pretrial procedures, which focus on examining the legality of enforcement actions, while the United States allows pretrial motions and hearings on a variety of issues. Finally, the right to legal counsel is recognized in both countries, although provisions regarding public defenders may differ.
The Supremacy Of Law In Human Rights Enforcement (A Solution To Settlement Of Human Rights Violations) Miftah Idris; Abdul Maasba Magassing
International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 03 (2023): August, International Journal of Education, vocational and Social Science (IJE
Publisher : Cita konsultindo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63922/ijevss.v2i03.313

Abstract

Despite the importance of human rights, violations of these rights continue to be widespread throughout the world. These violations can take many forms, including torture, discrimination, arbitrary detention, and restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly. Addressing these violations and promoting respect for human rights requires a multi-faceted approach, including legal protection, advocacy, education, and social and economic development. In solving the problems under study, the research method used is normative legal research with secondary data types which are analyzed in several ways to obtain qualitative research results. The research results show that the legal system plays an important role in upholding human rights and promoting accountability for those who violate them. Legal frameworks provide important protections for human rights, both domestically and internationally, and the judiciary serves as a key mechanism for upholding these protections. Potential solutions to improve the enforcement of human rights include increasing public awareness and education about human rights, strengthening the independence and capacity of the judiciary, and promoting international cooperation and collaboration in the enforcement of human rights.