Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Interdependence Journal of International Studies

RESPON PAKISTAN TERHADAP PENCABUTAN STATUS OTONOMI KHUSUS KASHMIR OLEH INDIA TAHUN 2019 Yudistira, Dwiki; Pasan, Etha; Wahyu, Frentika
Interdependence Journal of International Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54144/ijis.v3i2.53

Abstract

In 1948 India decided to give Kashmir special autonomy status which was written in Article 370 and 35A India Constitution. In August 2019. India decided to revoke the special autonomy status of Kashmir due to frequent conflicts in the Kashmir region that the local Kashmiri official could not resolve This policy made several countries and International Organizations respond to the policies issued by India. Pakistan is the only state actor who has responded to the actions taken by India which in increasing the escalation of the conflict and making relations between the two countries worse. The result of this research is the response issued by Pakistan, there are four. The first, Submission of a letter by Pakistan to the National Security Council (UNSC), second is the suspension of trade relations, third is the suspension of rail service and fourthly the decline in diplomatic relations.
Penolakan Amerika Serikat Terhadap Resolusi PBB UNEP/EA.3/RES.7 Tentang Pencemaran Laut dan Mikroplastik Farianto, Muhammad Reyza; Pasan, Etha
Interdependence Journal of International Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54144/ijis.v4i1.61

Abstract

The Purpose of this study was to examine the factors behind the United States Rejection of the Resolutuon UNEP/EA.3/RES.7 Marine Litter and Microplastics. Plastic waste pollution is an interesting topic for discussion at this time because it is a big problem for the world's environment. As the world's largest producer of plastic waste in 2016, the United States, which should have supported the resolution, actually rejected it. The data taken is in the form of secondary data and qualitative data analysis methods are used. The results of a study conducted by the United States show several disqualifying factors, namely the United States already has national regulations for waste management, including plastic waste, and also has a domestic plastic industry that is protected because if the settlement is adopted, the United States must reduce its plastic production and As the largest US exporter of plastic waste in China in 2017, it implemented a policy of no longer accepting various types of waste, making it difficult for the US to process its waste.