Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.63
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah Respati Jurnal Abdi Insani Journal of Soft Computing Exploration JTECS : Jurnal Sistem Telekomunikasi Elektronika Sistem Kontrol Power Sistem dan Komputer Jurnal Pengabdian Mitra Masyarakat (JPMM) SmartComp Intechno Journal : Information Technology Journal SWAGATI: Journal of Community Service
Bernadhed, Bernadhed
Universitas Amikom Yogyakarta
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Soft Computing Exploration

 1 
Comparative study of marker-based and markerless tracking in augmented reality under variable environmental conditions Sulistiyono, Mulia; Hasyim, Jaka Wardana; Bernadhed, Bernadhed; Liantoni, Febri; Sidauruk, Acihmah
Journal of Soft Computing Exploration Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : SHM Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52465/joscex.v5i4.503

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) technology integrates virtual content into real environments using two main methods: marker-based and markerless tracking. Marker-based tracking relies on printed markers for object placement, while markerless uses environmental features for flexibility and accuracy. This research aims to evaluate the combined impact of environmental factors-distance, angle, and lighting-on these two methods. The Multimedia Development Life Cycle (MDLC) methodology was applied by testing 72 combinations of indicators: distance (5-120 cm), angle (30°, 45°, 90°), and light color (red, blue, green, yellow) using Xiaomi Note 8 and Google Pixel 4. Results show markerless tracking is superior in all conditions, achieving a 94.4% success rate on both devices. In contrast, marker-based tracking only achieved 72.2% (Xiaomi Note 8) and 77.8% (Google Pixel 4). Markerless tracking was optimally performed from 50 cm away and up close, while marker-based tracking degraded in performance at long distances and red lighting. Markerless tracking proved to be more reliable and consistent, suitable for dynamic and diverse environments, while marker-based methods remained relevant for short distances and controlled lighting. These findings provide guidance for AR developers in choosing a tracking methodology according to application needs.
Co-Authors Acihmah Sidauruk Adjie, Resnafian Khrisna Alva Hendi Muhammad Bimantara, Aria Wangsa Eko Pramono Elik Hari Muktafin Fansyah, Rizki Hanif Fauzi, Moch Farid Febri Liantoni, Febri Fuady, Muhammad Dzikri Hasyim, Jaka Wardana Ihwanudin, Ihwanudin Jeki Kuswanto Kharisma, Rizqi Sukma Kusrini Kusrini Kusrini, Kusrini Laelangge, M. Johan Mahendra, Ega Majid Rahardi Mansur, Ahmad Farid Muktafin, Elik Hari Mulia Sulistiyono Mulya, Raffi Indra Negara, Putri Abdi Novita Indriyani Nuryanto, Niko Satia Pamungkas, Pantra Rizal Putri, Swandaru Reza Rahman, Jairufi Ramadhan, Ardyansyah Rizqi Sukma Kharisma Setiawan, Supriyanto Eka Setyawan, Yoga Fitri Sutarni, Sutarni Uyock Anggoro Saputro Wiwi Widayani, Wiwi Yossy Ariyanto Yusuf Affandi, Yusuf