Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengecualian Prinsip Non Retroaktif pada Hukum Formil: Pelanggaran atau Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia? Zashkia, Nurul
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 3 (2023): ALDEV
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i3.37969

Abstract

Hak untuk tidak dituntut atas dasar hukum yang berlaku surut atau prinsip non retroaktif merupakan hak konstitusional. Namun, penerapannya pada hukum formil di putusan praperadilan setelah penambahan penetapan tersangka sebagai objek praperadilan melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menyebabkan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia atas kepastian hukum yang adil. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan prinsip non retroaktif di berbagai putusan praperadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 069/PUU-II/2004 telah memberikan tafsir konstitusional mengenai penerapan prinsip non retroaktif hanya berlaku untuk hukum materiil meliputi pemidanaan dan pemberatan namun tidak berlaku pada hukum formil sehingga Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 yang berisi penambahan objek praperadilan seharusnya dapat berlaku surut. Putusan praperadilan yang bertentangan dengan tafsir tersebut bertentangan dengan tujuan kepastian hukum yang adil, menyebabkan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, dan terjadinya vandalisme tatanan hukum.
Towards a Green Constitution: Normative Reflection on Indonesia's 1945 Constitution in Global Comparative Context Arfandy, Muh Farhan; Zashkia, Nurul
WIDYAKALA JOURNAL : JOURNAL OF PEMBANGUNAN JAYA UNIVERSITY Vol 13, No 1 (2026): Urban Lifestyle and Urban Development
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat UPJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36262/widyakala.v13i1.1516

Abstract

This article analyzes the incorporation of environmental norms into constitutional law, focusing on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia within a comparative constitutional framework. Amid worsening global ecological degradation, the study investigates the extent to which the right to a healthy environment is recognized as a constitutional right and enforceable through legal mechanisms. Article 28H(1) and Article 33(4) of the 1945 Constitution reflect normative commitments to sustainable development, though in a general and non-justiciable form. Employing normative juridical and comparative legal methods, the study evaluates selected jurisdictions—Portugal, France, Ecuador, and India—which exhibit more progressive and enforceable environmental constitutionalism. The findings reveal that Indonesia's constitutional provisions remain insufficient in terms of clarity, institutional support, and judicial applicability. Therefore, this paper recommends a constitutional refinement through detailed and justiciable environmental provisions, accompanied by institutional guarantees. Strengthening environmental constitutionalism is essential to ensure intergenerational justice and ecological integrity within the framework of constitutional democracy..