Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

BENGKEL SASTRA BALAI BAHASA DIY DALAM PERSPEKSTIF SOSIOLOGI PIERE BOURDIEU Zamzuri, Ahmad
Paramasastra Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Vol 3 No 2 Bulan September Tahun 2016
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/parama.v3n2.p%p

Abstract

Yogyakarta in Indonesia literature is one of the literary arenas that are unseparated from prominent literary writers in Indonesia, such as Korrie Layun Rampan, WS. Rendra, Emha Ainun Nadjib, etc. Those writers are associated to literature community surrounding, such as Korrie Layun Rampan and Emha Ainun Nadjib whose were members of Persada Studi Klub (PSK) in 1969-1977 era. After PSK had dismissed, many literary community appeared to enlighten literary atmosphere in Yogyakarta. In 2000s, Studio Pertunjukan Sastra (SPS) and Sastra Bulan Purnama (SBP) appeared with different ways and styles in activating and appreciating literary works. Before those communities appeared, in 1996, a program (community) had born named Bengkel Sastra (BS) in the initiative of Balai Penelitian Bahasa Yogyakarta (now Balai Bahasa DIY). Bengkel Sastra (BS) offers creative process with applied practices in writing and oral expression through literary performance. BS becomes arena of modal transfer from tutor to participants. The transfer modal enable modal investment of BS's participants in preparing them to be writers in future. This research will focus on modal exchange, agent, and legitimate in BS. To explain those matters, this research used sociology theory of Pierre Bourdieu, particularly modal exchange and legitimate in agents in BS. This research is descriptive. The result shows that BS offers legitimate to agent (participants), although little, to enter literary world through celebrating works (books), and literary works performance orally.
IDEOLOGI DALAM NOVEL PABRIK KARYA PUTU WIJAYA Zamzuri, Ahmad
ATAVISME Vol 20, No 1 (2017): ATAVISME
Publisher : Balai Bahasa Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (172.725 KB) | DOI: 10.24257/atavisme.v20i1.303.14-26

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap ideologi dan formasi ideologi dalam novel Putu Wijaya yang berjudul Pabrik dengan menggunakan teori hegemoni Gramsci. Masalah penelitian ini adalah ideologi apa yang dapat ditemukan dalam novel dan bagaimanakah pembentukannya. Untuk mengungkap ideologi dan formasi ideologi dalam novel ini, penelitian menggunakan metode melalui langkah-langkah berikut: (1) menentukan subjek penelitian; (2) melakukan studi kepustakaan; (3) mengidentifikasi ideologi berdasarkan teori hegemoni Gramsci; dan (4) menganalisis formasi ideologi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada empat ideologi dalam novel tersebut, yaitu (1) ideologi otoritarianisme; (2) ideologi individualisme; (3) ideologi liberalisme; dan (4) ideologi anarkisme. Formasi ideologi dalam novel tersebut muncul dalam tiga hubungan, yaitu hubungan kontradiktif antara ideologi otoritarianisme dan demokrasi, hubungan korelatif antara ideologi liberalisme dan hedonisme, dan hubungan bawahan antara ideologi otoritarianisme dan liberalisme. [Title: Ideology in Putu Wijaya?s Pabrik]. This study aims to reveal the ideology and ideological formation in Putu Wijaya's novel entitled Pabrik using Gramsci's theory of hegemony. The problem of this study is what ideology that can be found in the novel and how its formation is. In revealing the ideology and ideological formation in the novel, this research is organized through the following steps: (1) determining the subject of research; (2) conducting library research; (3) identifying ideologies based on Gramsci's theory of hegemony; and (4) analyzing the ideological formation. The results show that there are four ideologies in the novel; those are (1) the ideology of authoritarianism; (2) the ideology of individualism; (3) the ideology of liberalism; and (4) the ideology of anarchism. The ideological formation in the novel appears in three relationships, namely the contradictory relationship between the ideology of authoritarianism and democracy, the correlative relationship between the ideology of liberalism and hedonism, and the subordinate relationship between the ideology of authoritarianism and liberalism.