Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Law Research Review Quarterly Realism: Law Review
Taufani, Galang
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Considering the Legal Efforts of Dispute Decisions on Election Results of the Constitutional Court Taufani, Galang
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 4 No 3 (2018): L. Research Rev. Q. (August 2018) "Law and Democracy in General Election: Between
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v4i03.27101

Abstract

Article 24C Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution confirms that the Constitutional Court (MK) has the authority to adjudicate at the first and last level with a final decision to review the Law against the Constitution. Related to election disputes, the Constitutional Court has the authority to adjudicate dispute cases and the Constitutional Court's decision is final and binding. It is undeniable that this matter becomes a debate, what if in the course of finding new evidence (novum) or what is the possibility of legal remedies in election disputes. This paper will try to explore what is the philosophy of the legal remedies and how it might be used in election disputes. By appealing to philosophical thinking it is hoped that a new thought can be drawn on these possibilities.
Legal Paradigm Shifts In The Age Of Digital Transformation Taufani, Galang; Negara, I Putu Endra Wijaya
Realism: Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Realism: Law Review (in progress)
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v4i1.131

Abstract

Digital transformation has reshaped the foundations of law, not only technologically but also normatively and methodologically. Legal paradigms in the digital era must be examined through systematic interpretation, doctrinal reasoning, and normative critique. This study, based on normative legal research with a conceptual approach, utilizes legal materials from books and scholarly journals. Findings reveal three major challenges: first, a legal vacuum and regulatory lag, as technological innovation outpaces regulation, leaving many digital activities ungoverned. Second, a jurisdictional crisis arises because territorially bound national legal systems cannot effectively regulate global digital interactions. Third, regulatory fragmentation occurs due to overlapping digital regulations, creating legal uncertainty. Consequently, the effectiveness of law in the digital age is not measured by the number of regulations but by its adaptability, integrative capacity, and progressive interpretation in response to technological dynamics. Without such transformation, law risks irrelevance in governing digital society
Co-Authors Putu Endra Wijaya Negara