Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Identifying the Driving Factors and Individual Attachment to Terrorist Groups: A Case Study of a Former JAD Member Ariyanta, Admiral; Priyanto, Sapto; Subandi, Imam
International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Taruna Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54298/ijith.v4i2.509

Abstract

Terrorist radicalization has become a tangible threat to global security, including in Indonesia, as many individuals remain exposed to radical ideologies and join terrorist groups. This study aims to understand the driving factors behind individuals' decisions to enter and the causes of their attachment to terrorist groups, using the case study of SMA (a former member of JAD). This research employs a qualitative method through direct interviews with SMA. The findings indicate that terrorism radicalization is a gradual process of transformation involving changes in worldview, identity shifts, and strengthened loyalty to the group, culminating in an individual's readiness to carry out acts of terror. In the case of SMA, social injustice and relative deprivation, particularly towards state institutions, served as driving factors for joining a terrorist group. The study also finds that individual attachment to terrorist groups may be influenced by psychological, social, and emotional aspects, wherein the terrorist group can serve as an ideological “home” for its members, and the “Ustad” within the group may function as an ideological “father.” Therefore, deradicalization programs should not only focus on ideology or the fulfillment of economic needs but also consider psychological and social aspects. This is because the driving factors and stages of radicalization for each terrorist group member are unique, thus requiring differentiated handling approaches.
IMPLEMENTASI KONSEP KEAMANAN NASIONAL DALAM UPAYA MENGHADAPI ANCAMAN SIBER DI INDONESIA Febi Cahya Manafe, Christo; Priyanto, Sapto; Subandi, Imam
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 10, No 4 (2023): NUSANTARA : JURNAL ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v10i4.2023.2063-2073

Abstract

Studi ini berargumen jika keamanan nasional adalah salah satu aspek terpenting dalam menjaga kemanan negara. Tidak hanya keamanan secara militer, Pemerintah juga perlu memperhatikan keamanan dari ruang siber. Oleh karena itu Pemerintah harus mengimplementasikan konsep keamanan nasional baik untuk ruang lingkup militer ataupun ruang siber. Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan kepustakaan yang berfokus pada teori keamanan nasional dan ancaman siber. Penelitian ini menemukan hasil bahwa: Pemerintah Indonesia saat ini sudah berusaha untuk menjaga keamanan nasional baik dari sisi militer ataupun siber. Namun dalam implementasinya, saat ini belum ada regulasi khusus yang mengatur mengenai keamanan nasional. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pemerintah saat ini sudah menjalankan beberapa strategi untuk menjaga keamanan nasional baik dari bidang militer ataupun bidang siber, akan tetapi perlu adanya regulasi khusus terkait keamanan nasional untuk semakin memperkuat strategi yang disiapkan.
Interception at a Crossroads: Juridical and Strategic Perspectives on Wiretapping in Indonesia’s Counter-Terrorism Framework in the Digital Era Artya, Ade; Priyanto, Sapto; Subandi, Imam
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2537

Abstract

This research investigates the critical crossroads in Indonesia's counter-terrorism strategy, where success in suppressing terrorist attacks coincides with the expansion of a dual surveillance apparatus in the digital era. Employing a qualitative approach with juridical normative analysis and the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) framework, this study examines the strategic and legal dimensions of wiretapping. Findings indicate that the formal legal framework, particularly Law No. 5 of 2018, provides a basis for effective proactive interception but contains ambiguities that grant broad discretionary power. Crucially, the research uncovers a parallel, unregulated surveillance regime involving invasive spyware procurement and extra legal agreements that bypass judicial oversight, thereby threatening civil liberties. The study concludes that this duality creates a security paradox, where tactical success masks systemic risks to the rule of law. Comprehensive legislative reform is imperative to establish a singular, proportional, transparent, and accountable framework.
Interception at a Crossroads: Juridical and Strategic Perspectives on Wiretapping in Indonesia’s Counter-Terrorism Framework in the Digital Era Artya, Ade; Priyanto, Sapto; Subandi, Imam
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2537

Abstract

This research investigates the critical crossroads in Indonesia's counter-terrorism strategy, where success in suppressing terrorist attacks coincides with the expansion of a dual surveillance apparatus in the digital era. Employing a qualitative approach with juridical normative analysis and the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) framework, this study examines the strategic and legal dimensions of wiretapping. Findings indicate that the formal legal framework, particularly Law No. 5 of 2018, provides a basis for effective proactive interception but contains ambiguities that grant broad discretionary power. Crucially, the research uncovers a parallel, unregulated surveillance regime involving invasive spyware procurement and extra legal agreements that bypass judicial oversight, thereby threatening civil liberties. The study concludes that this duality creates a security paradox, where tactical success masks systemic risks to the rule of law. Comprehensive legislative reform is imperative to establish a singular, proportional, transparent, and accountable framework.