Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Agama el-Aqwal: Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law
Harahap, Khoirul Amru
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Kesalahan Linguistik Hasil Terjemahan Mesin Terjemah Google Translate dari Teks Bahasa Arab ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia Harahap, Khoirul Amru
Jurnal Penelitian Agama Vol 15 No 1 (2014)
Publisher : IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (219.679 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/jpa.v15i1.2014.pp26-43

Abstract

Abstract: This study is aimed at analyzing linguistic errors of Arabic-to-Indonesian translation resulted from Google Translate. This is a literary research inwhich data were collected through taking sample errors in the provided texts. Thefindings of this research are as follows. Arabic-to-Indonesian translation resultedfrom Google Translate contains some linguistic errors, comprising morphological,syntactic, and semantic levels. Morphological errors include errors related to bothism and fi’il. Related to ism, for example, Google translate misread the harakat ismmusytaq; kasrah is read as fathah; which causes changes in meaning. GoogleTranslate also mistranslate ism mudzakkar to ism muannats. In addition, Googletranslates ism jamak into mufrad and not appropriately gives the equivalence toism maqshur. Meanwhile, in relation to fi’il, Google translates fi’il ma’lum into majhul,and fi’il majhul into ma’lum.Keywords: Linguistic, Translation, Google Tanslate, Indonesian Language. Abstrak: Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat beberapakesalahan linguistik dalam hasil terjemahan Google Translate dari teks bahasaArab ke dalam bahasa Indonesia, baik kesalahan pada tataran morfologis dankesalahan pada tataran sintaksis, maupun kesalahan pada tataran semantik.Kesalahan morfologis dari hasil terjemahan Google Translate, ada yang berkaitandengan ism dan ada yang berkaitan dengan fi’il. Yang berkaitan dengan ism,misalnya, Google keliru membaca harakat ism musytaq, yang seharusnya kasrahdibaca fathah. Hal ini membawa dampak pada perubahan makna. Google jugasalah menerjemahkan ism mudzakkar dan menerjemahkannya dengan bentukism muannats. Di samping itu, Google juga menerjemahkan ism jamak denganmufrad dan keliru mencari padanan arti yang tepat untuk ism maqshur. Sedangyang berkaitan dengan fi’il, Google menerjemahkan fi’il ma’lum menjadi majhuldan fi’il majhul menjadi ma’lum.Kata Kunci: Linguistik, Terjemahan, Google Tanslate, dan Bahasa Indonesia.
حكم الزواج بين رضعاء ألبان بنوك اللبن عند علماء الفقه الإسلامى Harahap, Khoirul Amru
Jurnal Penelitian Agama Vol 14 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/jpa.v14i1.2013.pp20-40

Abstract

اتفق الفقهاء أن الرضاع بالجملة يحرم منه مايحرم من النسب
Dirasah Muqaranah ‘an Hukm al-Zawaj Bayna Rudha’a Alban Bunuk al-Laban Fi Manzhur Fuqaha al-Aqdamin wa al-Mu’ashirin Harahap, Khoirul Amru; Umar, Muhammad Toha
Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Komparatif Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/el-aqwal.v3i1.10562

Abstract

The issue of Breast Milk Bank is a contemporary fiqh issue, and its ruling is not found in classical fiqh. However, classical Moslem scholars have studied the issue of radha in an unusual way known as al-major (breast milk put into the baby's mouth), al-south (breast milk put through the nose), and or putting breast milk into the baby's mouth using bottles and cups. Therefore, the fuqaha differed on the prohibition of marriage because of radha' unusually or indirectly such as radha' from a breast milk bank. After conducting a comparative analysis, the author concludes that the majority of classical scholars from the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hambali madhhabs, and most contemporary fiqh scholars, think that indirect radha', such as radha' from a breast milk bank, makes marriage prohibited. They reason that indirect radha' has the same effect as direct radha' regarding the growth of the baby's flesh and bones. Meanwhile, the Zhahiri school of classical jurisprudence and some contemporary jurisprudence scholars such as Yusuf al-Qardhawi think that indirect radha' such as radha' from a breast milk bank is not called radha'. According to them, radha' is only if the baby suckles directly on the mother's nipple. Hence, they think that radha' from a breast milk bank does not lead to the prohibition of marriage.
The Dilemma of Gender and Marital Validity in Khuntha Cases: A Comparative Legal Study of the Four Sunni Schools Harahap, Khoirul Amru; Harahap, Najhan Parluhutan; Umar, Mohamad Toha
Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Komparatif Volume 4 Issue 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/el-aqwal.v4i2.15026

Abstract

In Islamic jurisprudence, the validity of marriage is contingent upon clear gender classification, a condition that poses legal complexities in the case of khuntha (intersex individuals). Classical jurists recognized khuntha as a distinct legal category and developed nuanced rulings, particularly distinguishing between khuntha wādih and khuntha mushkil. However, advances in medical science and shifting socio-legal contexts necessitate a re-examination of these doctrines. This study adopts a doctrinal and comparative approach, analyzing the positions of the four Sunni schools—Hanafī, Mālikī, Shāfiʿī, and Hanbalī—on the permissibility of khuntha marriage. It engages classical legal texts, modern fatwas, and contemporary bioethical considerations to assess continuity and reform. The four schools unanimously prohibit marriage for khuntha mushkil without gender clarity, while permitting it for khuntha wādih upon identifiable signs. Divergences arise in their evidentiary standards and interpretive flexibility. Contemporary scholars increasingly advocate for the inclusion of medical criteria and expert consultation in gender determination. Islamic legal tradition provides a principled yet adaptable framework for addressing khuntha marriage. By integrating classical methodologies with contemporary scientific understanding, jurists can uphold Sharīʿah objectives while affirming the dignity and marital rights of intersex individuals. This reflects both fidelity to tradition and responsiveness to present realities.
Co-Authors Harahap, Najhan Parluhutan Umar, Mohamad Toha Umar, Muhammad Toha