Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

ENDOUROLOGIC MANAGEMENT IN NEGLECTED DOUBLE J STENT AT SOETOMO HOSPITAL SURABAYA RETROSPECTIVE-DESCRIPTIVE STUDY, PERIODE 2013-2016 Fathurrahman, Hasroni; Hakim, Lukman
Indonesian Journal of Urology Vol 27 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Indonesian Urological Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32421/juri.v27i1.525

Abstract

Objective: The use of various combinations of endourological techniques can be an effective solution in the management of neglected DJ stent. The variety of treatments that combine the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), retrograde cortolithotripsy (CLT) ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery have been used for the management of encrustation stent cases in a neglected DJ stent. Material & Methods: A Retrospective descriptive study by evaluating patients that have done undergoing endourological measures in the case of Neglected DJ stents in Soetomo General Hospital from January 2013 to December 2016. Data analysis based on age, gender, location of encrustation, indication of DJ stent insertion, duration of DJ stent insertion, and type of endourologic management. Results: In this study, the data of patients undergoing endourological action in Neglected DJ stent cases were 29 patients from January 2012 to December 2016. In Neglected DJ stent patients (41.4%) 12 were encrusted and (58.6%) 17 that there is no encrustation. From 29 patients neglected DJ stent, consisting of (20.7%) 6 males and (79.3%) 23 females, with ratio male to female 1:4, the incidence of DJ stent encrustation was 12 with ratio male to female 1:1, with ages ranging from 41-64 years. The most common cause of DJ stent insertion in Neglected DJ stent patients was malignancy that cause obstructive uropathy (72.4%) 2, all of them were female patients, followed by ureteral stones (24.1%) 7, where males (13.8%) 4 and women (10.3%) 3, and UPJ stenosis where there were only (3.4%) 1 men. In the neglected dentist stent there were 62 (62%) 18 unilateral stent (males (13.8%) 4 and female (48.3%) 14 while the bilateral stent were (37.9%) 11, where male (6.9%) 2 and female (31%) 9. Duration of DJ stent use in neglected DJ stent is higher in 15 weeks (20.7%) 6, followed by 17 weeks (17.2%) 5, 14 weeks (13.8%) 4, 16 weeks, 18 weeks, 20 weeks each (10.3%) 3, 13 weeks (6.9%) 2, and last order during 19 weeks, 26 weeks, 29 weeks each (3.4%) 1. Where the largest organ there is encrustation is Ureter (24.1%) 7, followed by renal with a kidney (10.3%) 3. After which the kidneys with ureter (3.4%) 1 and buli (3.4%) 1. Management of Neglected DJ stent without encrustation performed procedure of removing DJ stent 17 (58.6%), while management of Neglected DJ stent with stent encrustation. The majority procedure was URS (13.8%) 4, followed by URS + PCNL and ESWL pre op + URS respectively (6.9%) 2, and few with ESWL preoperative procedures, CLT, CLT + PCNL, and ESWL pre operation + CLT + PCNL about (3.4%) 1. Conclusion: The neglected ratio male to female 1:4, while the incidence of DJ stent encrustation was 12 with ratio male to female 1:11. The most common cause of DJ stent insertion in Neglected Dj stent patients was malignancy that cause obstructive uropathy, followed by ureteral stones and UPJ stenosis Patients with unilateral DJ stent more than those with bilateral DJ stent. Duration of DJ stent usage in Neglected DJ stent at most for 15 weeks and last order for 19-29 weeks. In Neglected DJ patients the patient incrustation ratio and no incrustation were 2:3. Management of the Neglected DJ stent without encrustation is performed by DJ stent with cystoscopy, while the management of the Neglected DJ stent with encrustation is performed with a multimodal endourology procedure, among others: a combination of URS, PCNL, ESWL pre-op and CLT. The most commonly organ that have encrustation is the ureter, the second sequence is the bladder with the kidney, and finally the kidney with the ureter and the bladder.
THE EFFECT OF SILODOSIN AND SODIUM DICLOFENAC TO REDUCE PAIN AFTER DJ STENT REMOVAL IN SOETOMO HOSPITAL: DOUBLE-BLINDED RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED TRIAL Fathurrahman, Hasroni; Soebadi, Doddy M; Hakim, Lukman
Indonesian Journal of Urology Vol 26 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indonesian Urological Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32421/juri.v26i1.537

Abstract

Objective: To analyze, measure, compare, prove, and evaluate effectiveness of silodosin, diclofenac sodium, and the combination of both drugs in pain management after stent removal. Materials & Methods: Thirty-three patients were divided into three groups. Group I was given diclofenac Sodium 50 mg, group II was given silodosin 8 mg and group III was given the combination of diclofenac sodium 50 mg and silodosin 8 mg. The Wong Baker Pain Scale (WBPS) was assessed serially: two hours before the DJ stent removal, during DJ stent removal, and after the DJ stent removal (2 hours and 24 hours after). The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: In this study, 33 patients who underwent DJ stent removal were obtained. Wong Baker was presented in median (min-max) form. The WBPS study in each group did not differ statistically significant. Lowest WBPS during DJ stent removal was found in group III. Group III was better and statistically significant in reducing pain compared to group I and group II (p<0.05). WBPS two hours after removal in each group decreased and group III was better and statistically significant in reducing pain compared to group II, whereas group III compared to group I had an equivalent effectiveness. While the WBPS 24 hours after removal had the same value and did not differ significantly. No side effects or adverse events were found in the use of diclofenac sodium, silodosin, and their combinations. Conclusion: Single oral dose of diclofenac sodium combined with silodosin is effective to reduce pain after DJ stent removal.
HUBUNGAN VOLUME PROSTAT DENGAN SKOR IPSS PADA PENDERITA BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA (BPH) DI RSU HAJI MEDAN MAGHFIRA, JIHAN; FATHURRAHMAN, HASRONI; RIZALDI, ARIL
JURNAL ILMIAH SIMANTEK Vol 7 No 4 (2023): JURNAL ILMIAH SIMANTEK
Publisher : LP2MTBM MAKARIOZ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a benign neoplasm in which the periurethral state of the prostate experiences hyperplasia. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) can cause complaints that interfere with daily activities, although it is rarely life-threatening. These complaints can be in the form of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The IPSS questionnaire is used as a measure of the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Prostate volume is important as a reference for the severity of the progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or the outcome of this disease in the form of acute urinary retention (AUR), as well as the response to treatment. This study aims to determine the relationship between prostate volume and IPSS score in patients with Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) at RSU Haji Medan. This study used a retrospective analytic observational study design with a cross-sectional design approach that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and was carried out in the urology department of RSU Haji Medan. Based on the results of a study conducted from September to December at the Haji Medan General Hospital, 93 samples were obtained. The highest incidence of BPH was in the age range of 61–70 years, with 40 people (43.0%). The highest volume was in classification 1 (20-39cc), with as many as 53 people (57.0%), and the most frequent degree was the degree of severity, with as many as 39 people (41.9%). The results of the Spearman correlation test showed that there was a significant relationship between volume and the IPSS score in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), p<0,001 with a correlation coefficient (r = 0.853), indicating a very strong correlation, where the value of the correlation coefficient is positive, which means that the relationship between the two variables is unidirectional. Prostate volume and IPSS score have a significant relationship in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).