Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

STATUS HUKUM HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG TERKENA ABRASI Susiati, Dwi; Setiadji, Sri
Mimbar Keadilan Vol 13 No 1 (2020): Februari 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v13i1.3082

Abstract

Abrasion is a natural disaster that results in the owner of the right to land losing the right to control, use or take advantage of the land, because the land is lost in part or in whole due to erosion by water. Article 27 of the Law On Agraria determines that property rights over land are destroyed if the land is destroyed. In this study, the author will analyze the legal status of property of land affected by abrasion with the formulation of the problem What is the legal status of property rights on land affected by abrasion according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and how to guarantee the protection of affected land rights abrasion. The results of this study are that the status of land rights affected by abrasion is abolished, both in the provisions of the Law On Agraria and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration because it is no longer compatible with physical data or juridical data as a strong evidence. The government has an obligation to provide guarantees and protection of rights to land affected by abrasion and those that have been affected by abrasion in part or in whole. On the basis of the state's right to control Article 2 of the Law On Agraria the state has the right to regulate land use, inventory, and maintenance to prevent and reduce the impact of abrasion on its citizens. The government can also provide compensation as contained in Article Number 24 of 2007 concerning Disaster Management which determines that the Government and regional governments are responsible for the implementation of disaster management.Abrasi merupakan bencana alam yang mengakibatkan pemilik hak atas tanah kehilangan hak untuk menguasai, menggunakan, atau mengambil manfaat atas tanah, karena tanah tersebut hilang sebagian atau seluruhnya akibat pengikisan oleh air. Pasal 27 UUPA menentukan hak milik atas tanah hapus, apabila tanahnya musnah. Pada penelitian ini, penulis akan menganalisa tentang status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi dengan rumusan masalah Bagaimana status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi menurut PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah  dan bagaimana jaminan perlindungan hak-hak tanah yang terdampak abrasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa status hak atas tanah yang terkena abrasi adalah hapus, baik dalam ketentuan UUPA maupun PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah karena tidak sesuai lagi dengan data fisik maupun data yuridis sebagai alat bukti yang kuat. Pemerintah mempunyai kewajiban untuk memberikan jaminan dan perlindungan hak-hak atas tanah yang terdampak abrasi maupun yang sudah terkena abrasi baik sebagian maupun seluruh tanahnya. Atas dasar hak menguasai oleh negara Pasal 2 UUPA negara berhak mengatur peruntukan, penggunaan, persediaan,dan pemeliharaan tanah untuk mencegah dan mengurangi dampak abrasi bagi warga negaranya. Pemerintah juga dapat memberikan ganti kerugian sebagaimana yang ada di dalam UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana yang menentukan bahwa Pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah menjadi penanggung jawab dalam penyelenggaraan penang-gulangan bencana.
EKSEKUSI JAMINAN KREDIT BERUPA KIOS PASAR OLEH BANK Hardianto, Tri; Nasution, Krisnadi; Setiadji, Sri
Jurnal Akrab Juara Vol 4 No 5 (2019)
Publisher : Yayasan Akrab Pekanbaru

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The bank is an intermediary institution, meaning that its main activities are raising funds and channeling funds to the public. The funds withdrawn from the community are then channeled back to the community in the form of credit. Lending is generally done by entering into an agreement. "The agreement consists of a principal agreement, namely a debt and credit agreement and is followed by an additional agreement in the form of a guarantee agreement by the debtor. One object commonly used as collateral in a credit agreement is a market stall. The problem in this research is how the legal status of market kiosk ownership is used as a credit guarantee by the bank and how the bank's position in executing the credit guarantee is in the form of a market kiosk if the debtor defaults. In terms of the market stall material law cannot be categorized as an object because the market stall is only a permit to use the building, it cannot give birth to material relations even though the debtor has a permit in the form of a certificate of use of the right to sell in the form of KBP, SPTU, BPTU or type of permit to use the market stall others from the local government. Traders only have the right to lease or the right to use the market stall they occupy, the trader is not the owner. Until now because there are no regulations governing the mechanism of execution of credit guarantees in the form of market kiosks, execution of credit guarantees by binding under the form of market kiosks is carried out by asking the assistance of the market head or the market manager authorized to carry out the takeover of these market kiosks. transferred (leased) to other parties who intend to rent the kiosk.
EKSEKUSI JAMINAN KREDIT BERUPA KIOS PASAR OLEH BANK Hardianto, Tri; Nasution, Krisnadi; Setiadji, Sri
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 5 (2019)
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The bank is an intermediary institution, meaning that its main activities are raising funds and channeling funds to the public. The funds withdrawn from the community are then channeled back to the community in the form of credit. Lending is generally done by entering into an agreement. "The agreement consists of a principal agreement, namely a debt and credit agreement and is followed by an additional agreement in the form of a guarantee agreement by the debtor. One object commonly used as collateral in a credit agreement is a market stall. The problem in this research is how the legal status of market kiosk ownership is used as a credit guarantee by the bank and how the bank's position in executing the credit guarantee is in the form of a market kiosk if the debtor defaults. In terms of the market stall material law cannot be categorized as an object because the market stall is only a permit to use the building, it cannot give birth to material relations even though the debtor has a permit in the form of a certificate of use of the right to sell in the form of KBP, SPTU, BPTU or type of permit to use the market stall others from the local government. Traders only have the right to lease or the right to use the market stall they occupy, the trader is not the owner. Until now because there are no regulations governing the mechanism of execution of credit guarantees in the form of market kiosks, execution of credit guarantees by binding under the form of market kiosks is carried out by asking the assistance of the market head or the market manager authorized to carry out the takeover of these market kiosks. transferred (leased) to other parties who intend to rent the kiosk.
KEDUDUKAN SUBSISTEM KEJAKSAAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA Umam, Khairul; Setiadji, Sri; Darmawan, Arif
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 6 No. 3 (2021)
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan dan fungsi jaksa dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia menurut KUHAP. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini metode yuridisme normatif yaitu metode penambahan dengan berpegang pada norma atau hukum yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: 1. Kejaksaan di Indonesia memiliki kewenangan yang cukup terbatas dibandingkan dengan kejaksaan di Belanda, Inggris atau Amerika.Selain itu tercantum dalam KUHAP, tugas dan wewenang kejaksaan dalam menjalankan sebagai subsistem/komponen penegak hukum sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia tercantum dalam Undang- Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang kejaksaan. Kejaksaan adalah lembaga non-departemen, yang berarti tidak berada di bawah kementerian apapun, puncak kepemimpinan kejaksaan dipegang oleh jaksaagung yang bertanggung jawab terhadap presiden. 2. Proses peradilan pidana dapat dimaknai sebagai keseluruhan tahapan pemeriksaan perkara pidana untuk mengungkap perbuatan pidana yang terjadi dan mengambil tindakan hukum kepada pelakunya.Dengan melalui berbagai institusi, maka proses peradilan dimulai dari institusi Kejaksaan, sampai ke Institusi Pengadilan dan berakhir pada Institusi Lembaga Pemasyarakatan.