Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Materiil menurut Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Kepanjen Arrozi, Fakhruddin
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 4 No. 01 (2014): April 2014
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (625.53 KB) | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2014.4.01.71-91

Abstract

Abstract: This paper describes the material tort against the decision of Pengadilan Negeri (PN) of Kepanjen No. 91/Pid.B/2008 / PN.KPJ on a post-verdict corruption of Constitutional Court of RI. No.003/PUU-IV/2006 and then analyzes from the standpoint of positive law and criminal (jinayah) Jurisprudence. The study concludes that although a tort is legally no longer valid in law of Indonesia after the Constitutional Courts decision but in the case of corruption, Pengadilan Negeri of Kepanjen still applies the rule of the material tort. The existence of obscurity formula of tort is caused by the interpretation of the law and jurisprudence on tort material conducted by PN Kepanjen. The action of Pengadilan Negeri of Kepanjen in performing legal discovery and referring to jurisprudence, according to the criminal jurisprudence perspective, is true because Islam encourages its followers to do ijtihad when the rules are silent on the case submitted to the judge. If the judge cannot do ijtihad, he should refer to the previous jurisprudence. Keywords: Law, material, corruption, jurisprudence
Negotiating Custom and Sharia: A Legal Review of the Bontowon Kon Bui’an Marriage Tradition in Bolaang Mongondow, Indonesia Nurozi, Ahmad; Sobaya, Soya; Mamonto, Fikri Fachrurozi; Rohman, Moh. Fatkur; Arrozi, Fakhruddin
Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam
Publisher : STAI Publisistik Thawalib Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54150/alirsyad.v5i1.880

Abstract

The Bontowon Kon Bui’an tradition in Bolaang Mongondow raises concerns regarding symbolic kinship severance prior to endogamous marriage, which may appear to conflict with Islamic principles that emphasize the sanctity of family ties. This study evaluates whether Bontowon Kon Bui’an constitutes ‘Urf ?a??? or contradicts Sharia principles. Qualitative fieldwork was conducted through participant observation, semi-structured interviews with customary and religious leaders, and document analysis. Data were analyzed using ‘Urf, maq??id al-shar?’ah, and living law frameworks. The findings suggest that the symbolic severance of kinship functions as a ritualized mechanism rather than an actual breach of family ties. The practice aligns local social norms with Islamic expectations, with religious authorities demonstrating contextual tolerance provided the practice is recognized culturally rather than theologically. From the maq??id al-shar?’ah perspective, the tradition fosters communal harmony, prevents familial conflict, and reinforces family honor. These results indicate that local customs can coexist with Sharia when interpreted through appropriate normative frameworks, illustrating the adaptive and negotiated nature of Islamic law in pluralistic cultural contexts. In conclusion, Bontowon Kon Bui’an exemplifies how symbolic local customs can harmonize with Islamic law without violating core Sharia principles. This study provides insights for scholars, policymakers, and practitioners on integrating customary practices with Islamic law to preserve social harmony and cultural values.